This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Maharashtra. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Maharashtra|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Maharashtra. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to India.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2a/Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg/32px-Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg.png)
watch |
Articles for deletion
[edit]- Rahul Roushan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This subject cannot pass WP:GNG. Many of the cited sources are actually Godi media sources which are no longer taken seriously especially when it comes to establishing WP:N. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Journalism, Conservatism, Entertainment, Bihar, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Jogeshwari Misal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a contested draftification. The subject fails to meet the notability guideline for companies; the cited sources are not reliable, and I have not found any promising sources after a quick search. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, India, and Maharashtra. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @TechnoSquirrel69 actually, I reviewed this article, as it is from the same region I belong to, I found information mentioned in article is valid. I saw notice above this article and want to contribute in this article if it is helpful. Krishna Nimbalkar (talk) 10:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Krishna Nimbalkar: Feel free to contribute to the article if it interests you, but I want to note that this is not an issue of the information's validity but of the subject's notability. We need multiple reliable sources that have significant coverage of the subject in order to determine that it is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 13:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @TechnoSquirrel69 actually, I reviewed this article, as it is from the same region I belong to, I found information mentioned in article is valid. I saw notice above this article and want to contribute in this article if it is helpful. Krishna Nimbalkar (talk) 10:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Delete It does not meet WP:NORG. The references are either primary sources, or passing and extremely brief mentions on independent sources. In other words, it's just another restaurant chain. Ira Leviton (talk) 15:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Subhash Shinde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable makeup professional. There's a long list of films that are unverified. Brief mention in this article but that doesn't meet WP:GNG. Other search results are various social media accounts. ZimZalaBim talk 22:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Shellwood (talk) 22:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Idris Naikwadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable local mayor. Mccapra (talk) 23:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and India. Mccapra (talk) 23:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NPOLITICIAN; subject does not appear to be a politician or judge who has held "international, national, or state/province–wide office", nor has he been a member of a legislative body at that level. Fails secondary criteria of receiving significant coverage as a local politician as well; searching his name yields almost nothing except a few articles merely stating he was elected (and later expelled from his own party), but nothing remotely approaching WP:SIGCOV.
- On top of this, article appears to have been created by the subject and is nothing more than an (unreferenced) list of his positions and awards, as well as an external links section of dubious quality and significance. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 05:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Clearly fails WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Youknow? (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator and previous comments. The criteria for WP:NPOL is at least state/province–wide office (for countries with federal or similar systems of government), which I don't think is met by him being a mayor of a municipal corporation. Prof.PMarini (talk) 23:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ahmedabad–Darbhanga Sabarmati Express (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Since this was dePRODed, I am creating an AfD. In my opinion, the article does not meet guidelines for WP:NOTABILITY. It is just a WP:ROTM service. The article seems WP:INDISCRIMINATEly created and more suited to a rail information website.
I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason:
Arnav Bhate (talk) 10:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bihar, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per my arguments every other time one of these articles gets nominated. Thryduulf (talk) 12:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all The first two articles are extensions of named trains however the titles are not reasonable search terms as they are made up by the author "[TERMINAL A] - [TERMINAL B] [TRAIN NAME]" and not used by any official or reliable sources, so a redirect wouldn't be appropriate. The content in the articles are mainly a reproduction of the timetable or WP:OR which is either unsuitable for article space entirely or would not require keeping redirects for attribution since its a copy of a different source. The third article is an unnamed train with made up title "[TERMINAL A] - [TERMINAL B] [FREQUENCY] Special" and should be deleted entirely. Jumpytoo Talk 21:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Gamaji Bhangare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:CASTE cruft bio created by IP socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala. First tried to hijack Gamaliel when that failed started this page through another IP hop. Gotitbro (talk) 10:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, History, Military, India, and Maharashtra. Gotitbro (talk) 10:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG. I can not verify any sources except for one but that is not on the subject of this page. RangersRus (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Although the article is not properly written but it meets the WP:GNG and WP:V per the cited sources.2409:4051:38B:9FBC:2307:730F:F39B:ED93 (talk) 03:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)— 2409:4051:38B:9FBC:2307:730F:F39B:ED93 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep: article is related to the Maratha Army of the Maratha empire that ruled northern India from 1600_1800 and also meets Verifiability.195.170.172.189 (talk) 00:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)— 195.170.172.189 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 13:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails GNG. One trivial mention in this journal (with the same text as this book). Nothing else. Although weirdly a mention apparently appears in The Wikipedia Revolution (Andrew Lih, 2009) but the contents are unavailable on Google Books so I'm not sure why. C F A 💬 16:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Pradeep Kumar (producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 06:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, Bihar, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep there is a lot of news story talking about the guy on Google News Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we don't go by Google hits but by reliable secondary sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. No SIGCOV or any notability guideline met. Has a promotional tone too. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:GNG. Article standing on nothing and there is nothing to support its existence here. Ednabrenze (talk) 08:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Fakt Marathi Cine Sanman for Best Director (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. This is an award given by a television network. There is no coverage much less GNG coverage of the topic of the article which is the award. North8000 (talk) 13:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Fakt Marathi Cine Sanman: Not really opposed to Keep as WP:SPLITLIST. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 18:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. No GNG or SIGCOV. Redirect won't really of any help and there is no coverage justifying the article's existence. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 23:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect: as suggested seems fine, I don't see sourcing that isn't primary now used as sourcing in the article. I can't find much in my searches, but I don't speak the local language so I'm not sure what would be a RS. Oaktree b (talk) 00:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)