The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Unfunny April Fools joke is unfunny. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review[edit]

Wikipedia:Deletion review (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Deletion Review is normally used as a method of re-litigating Articles for Deletion. Rather than having a separate forum that is meant to be to correct closer errors, we should split the functions of this noticeboard into two processes. First, all AFDs should be given a tentative close and then Relisted to permit re-litigation. Second, any real questions about closures can go, like questions about closures of RFCs, to WP:AN. Third, the ArbCom should impose discretionary sanctions on deletion discussions, permitting the topic-banning of editors who nominate too many articles for deletion. (Yes, that is a third process. Getting the count right can be done when re-litigating.) Robert McClenon (talk) 00:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment How do you propose we review the deletion of deletion review? Sulfurboy (talk) 00:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia:Reviews for creation Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 01:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• This needs an RfC first to build the replacement. Deleting DRV leaves no avenue for appeal. Guy (help!) 00:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Given the date of this nomination, I can neither support nor oppose. Therefore, my !vote is: Suppose. BD2412 T 00:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. The only way to ensure we correct closer errors is to introduce more drama. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 00:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Coffee. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 00:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • redirect to User talk:Robert McClenon --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 01:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is an equally high-quality proposal. BD2412 T 01:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Coffee with deep fried okra? Is that somebody's idea of a wikipedian breakfast? -- RoySmith (talk) 01:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • I believe the correct reading is "coffee deep fried okra", i.e., the okra is deep fried in coffee. BD2412 T 01:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Pretty sure that's the recipe for gray goo. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Opport per BD2412.—S Marshall T/C 13:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.