Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hello, please look at this user he is editing majority particular caste related articles and is heavily using doubtful references. He is Rajput promoting account only. Check his contributions.

Please once see this Battle of Mandan page. Not a single source looks credible. 2 out of 3 the sources are even low rated on Google books and one is by a caste historian.

References

1) Hooja, Rima (2006). A History of Rajasthan. Rupa and company.

2) Sinh, Ranbir (2001). History of Shekhawats. p. 280.

3) Meharda, B.L. Territory, Polity, and Status- A Study of Shekhawats.

Here 1st source is from some Rupa company, other 2 are from caste writers not credible historians.

This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please User:Sitush check it.

Hey Sitush--how are you, old friend? I hope you are well. Seven more years until I retire and then I'll come look you up. Hey, I ran into Draft:Eric Langmuir and thought of you--perhaps you can help it along. Take care, Drmies (talk) 22:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Five more years to go here, although the government may move the goalposts again!

How weird. I recently got to know someone who was at Peterhouse with Langmuir and went on to do quite a bit of mountaineering type of thing while running an army camp on Scotland. Then he took on a outdoors-y charity up there, around Aviemore IIRC. Alas, he's in his 90s and Alzheimer's has made an empty shell of him this last couple of years.

I'll see what I can do with it, although I think it probably already scrapes past GNG. - Sitush (talk) 18:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I am sure he scrapes by--it's more that I was asking you to help make it as good as possible; I want to give these old guys, dead and alive, the credit that they're due. It's so easy to write up the current and next YouTube idiot, but there's so many people who actually did shit. Let's not start talking about Alzheimer's, right? ;) Drmies (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I haven't talked to you in a long time. I hope all is well.

I have a problem affecting a number of articles that I don't know how to solve and I don't know who to go to. Could I send you an email about that?–CaroleHenson (talk) 02:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue got pushed into one pathway, so I am good. Still having fun?–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rajput clans of Haryana indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sitush, I see that you have dealt with this issue multiple times.

Thiyya and Ezhava are considered as synonymous by Wikipedia and all admins and majority of editors, and this was already discussed multiple times and are included in the main page Ezhava , However a small group from both sides seems to claim that both are separate .

This has been overly discussed every year from 2012 ownwards(almost every year) and the final decision was or consensus was that both are synonymous from the WP:RAJ Sources . (Please see the links )

[[1]] [[2]] [[3]]

In addition to that multiple accounts in the name thiyya, thiyyas , tiyyas etc were created previously claiming that these are distinct from Ezhava, However in all cases the consensus was that all these pages in the names "thiyya,tiyyas,thiyyas were permanently redirected to the page Ezhava.

[[4]] [[5]] [[6]]

However now a new page Tiyyar is being created (or lifted redirect ) , pointing to the same people Thiyya/Thiyyas simply by changing the spelling of the name Thiyya to "Tiyyar".

From the logs I can see that you have already given a warning to user -"HariNellatt" (see link) [[7]] a month ago who was disruptively lifting the redirect without any further discussions.

Isn't this a mockery of the system that already such a consensus was made regarding this and the pages were permanently redirected to the main pageEzhava, but simply new pages are being created by changing the spellings pointing to the same group thiyya.

I think this also need to be either moved to a draftspace or need to be permanently redirected similar to thiyya and thiyyas as multiple people are simply lifting the redirect with different claims , just like what happended with older pages thiyya and thiyyas Lisa121996 (talk) 02:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]