Need Article Reviewing
Hi Scartol, I found that you have done a nice review of the article Amador Valley High School. If you don't mind, I would like to request you to review & copyedit another article. I have contributed immensely in the article Dhaka Residential Model College and nominated it for good article. Could you please review the article in order to obtain GA status? I hope you will consider my request. Please inform your thoughts on my talk page. Thanks, Tanweer Morshed (talk) 08:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 01:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dabomb87 (talk) 03:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009
- New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
- Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
- News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
East Timor citations...
Hello there. From my checks of the Indonesian occupation of East Timor article there are a few citations that did not have their full reference listed - even from your first expansion. And yes, they also are needed to complete the fork split to the Santaz Cruz massacre page. They are...
- Alatas - intended to be "The pebble in the shoe : the diplomatic struggle for East Timor"?
- Singh -
- Andersen - Benedict Andersen?
- "Pinto & jardine" - it seems these two have their own individual citations (which are complete in the article/s), but there is a cite listing them together.
cheers --Merbabu (talk) 22:43, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 13:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009
- From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
- Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
- Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
- News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
- Dispatches: Sounds
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
- Interview: Interview with John Blossom
- News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
- In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Your song
Loved it... "now I'm FACin' it" was especially apt, too. :-P -- Mentifisto 17:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm helping some editors take Philip Larkin through FAC. Of course, I suggested a rigorous peer review first! I was wondering if you would be willing to comment here? Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 18:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)