Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Rugged individualism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Jessica Cisneros. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did, twat.

I already responded to you about "rugged individualism,' so please explain why you're ignoring that message I left.

And, as for "Jessica Cisneros," you, mako001, are the one who is not being factual. As of last night, the race was not called between Cisneros and Cuellar. Yet, you kept writing on the page that "Jessica Cisneros lost in 2022." And I repeatedly fixed your ignorant mistake, only for you to rewrite it again. Explain your repeated goal of misleading readers and deleting facts. 24.194.73.98 (talk) 01:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Rugged individualism, you may be blocked from editing. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica Cisneros. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Jessica Cisneros shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Beccaynr (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who the hell do you think you are?

You don't like facts, so you just delete them and block those who correct the record. Is Wikipedia now run by the rightwing? 24.194.73.98 (talk) 01:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your text additions at Rugged individualism and Jessica Cisneros do not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Rugged individualism and Jessica Cisneros) for a period of 1 month for disruptive editing, edit warring.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 08:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]