The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Genre |
|
Based on | Wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer |
Written by | Robert L. Freedman Selma Thompson Jonathan Platnick Linda Yellen |
Directed by | Peter Levin |
Starring | Catherine Oxenberg Christopher Baines Olivia de Havilland Dana Wynter Ray Milland Stewart Granger |
Music by | David Palmer |
Country of origin | United States |
Original language | English |
Production | |
Executive producers | Linda Yellen Terry Ellis |
Producer | Linda Yellen |
Cinematography | Arthur Ornitz |
Editor | Jay Freund |
Running time | 120 minutes |
Production company | Chrysalis-Yellen Productions |
Original release | |
Network | CBS |
Release | September 20, 1982 |
The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana is a 1982 American made-for-television biographical drama film that depicts the events leading to the wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer. The film was directed by Peter Levin and starred Catherine Oxenberg, Christopher Baines, Olivia de Havilland, Dana Wynter, Stewart Granger and Ray Milland. It originally aired September 20, 1982, on CBS.[1]
Cast
[edit]- Catherine Oxenberg - Lady Diana Spencer
- Christopher Baines - Charles, Prince of Wales
- Olivia de Havilland - Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother
- Dana Wynter - Queen Elizabeth II
- Ray Milland - Mr. Griffiths
- Stewart Granger - Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
- Holland Taylor - Frances Shand Kydd
- George Martin - John Spencer, 8th Earl Spencer
Reception
[edit]The movie debuted on United States television on the CBS network on Monday, September 20, 1982, and was the most watched prime-time television show of the week, with a 24.0 Nielsen rating and 37 share.[2] It outperformed ABC's Charles and Diana: A Royal Love Story, which had aired three days earlier but had been only the 28th most watched show in America for the prior week.[2][3]
John J. O'Connor, television critic for The New York Times, found that the movie was "much more fixated on the purely romantic possibilities of the story" of Charles and Diana compared to its ABC competition. Instead of touching on any contemporary problems in Britain, the film provides "an outrageously gooey theme song and periodic helicopter shots of stunning countryside," and "emotional high points" such as Diana deciding to get a hair cut. O'Connor opined that Olivia de Havilland played the Queen Mother "with beatific elegance" and Dana Wynter played Queen Elizabeth II "with infinite reserve."[4]
Tom Shales' review for The Washington Post was a great deal less kind, disliking the fairytale nature of the movie. He called it a piece of "slack-jawed heraldic voyeurism incapable of, and apparently uninterested in, transforming remote news figures into believable mortals." Shales preferred the ABC movie, calling it "48 times better," and decrying Diana's representation as "something of a Pollyanna, or a Cinderella - a sweet innocent sprite upon whom a fairy godmother bestowed a few crucial wishes."[5]
Production
[edit]The movie was filmed in Westbury, New York; Brewster, New York; and New York City, as well as in England.[6][7]
That the ABC and CBS films debuted three days apart was not a coincidence. CBS had planned to show Royal Romance in December as a Hallmark-sponsored pre-Christmas film, but then moved the air date back to September, even before the official start of the new ratings season. ABC then jumped their movie ahead of CBS, so late in the game that TV Guide did not list it.[5][8] When one reviewer asked to get a preview of either movie, he was told in one case "Are you kidding? They're still gluing the tape together."[7][9][10]
Legacy
[edit]As is typical of television movies developed to leverage the popularity of current events, The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana has been called a "forgettable" movie with only occasional press references (such as that it was Oxenburg's acting debut). The movie has never been officially released on VHS or DVD. In 2012, the New York Times reported on a brief spat over the credits for the film, which is likely the most ever written about the movie since 1982, albeit about a minor issue. A dispute arose over whether Janet Grillo could properly claim a "story writer" credit, though it was agreed that she did co-write a story outline for the film.[11]
In 2011, producer Linda Yellen returned to the well using the next generation of British royalty to direct the television movie William & Catherine: A Royal Romance.[12]
References
[edit]- ^ Film information at Diana's Legacy
- ^ a b (4 October 1982). New season off to semi-start, Broadcasting, p.50
- ^ (29 September 1982). CBS romance with royalty wins Nielsen-race crown, Arizona Republic (Associated Press)
- ^ O'Connor, John J. (20 September 1982). 'The Royal Romance' on CBS, The New York Times
- ^ a b Shales, Tom (20 September 1982). CBS Bows too Deeply to Charles and Diane, The Washington Post
- ^ Corry, John (26 June 1982). Brief on the Arts, The New York Times
- ^ a b Unger, Aurther (17 September 1982) Re-creating the royal wedding -- and network news troubles, Christian Science Monitor
- ^ Bedell, Sally (24 August 1982). TV Season: Caution is the Keynote, The New York Times (this article reported on August 24, 1982, that ABC believed CBS would show Romance on September 27)
- ^ Hanauer, Joan (14 September 1982). Substitute Witness, UPI (the Hallmark film for December 1982 ended up being a remake of Witness for the Prosecution)
- ^ Clark, Kenneth R. (15 September 1982). TV World, UPI (as of September 15, 1982, UPI was reporting that the ABC did not have an air date, even though it ended up airing on September 17)
- ^ Rohter, Larry (3 September 2012). Dispute Erupts at N.Y.U. Over Credits for 1982 TV Movie, The New York Times
- ^ (31 May 2011). 'William and Kate: A Royal Love Story' movie will show the effect of Princess Diana on the couple, Daily News (New York) (Associated Press)
External links
[edit]- Full film online, YouTube.com
- The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana at IMDb