Initiated by Bob drobbs (talk) at 23:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Bob drobbs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
• Huldra (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHuldra&type=revision&diff=1058179961&oldid=1058154389

Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zero0000&diff=next&oldid=1058173389
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zero0000&diff=next&oldid=1058174873

I created the article on David Collier (political activist) in good faith with the belief that the subject met notability standards. It's currently in the process of AFD with mixed results. I only learned after the fact that there's drama between him and some users.

In what might be our first interaction ever, Huldra says in the AFD I should be topic banned for creating this page.[1]

Later, I left a message on her talk page informing her that accusations she's made against the topic of this article[2] could be a BLP violation and in future AFD discussions to please stick to notability instead of sharing her personal thoughts about the subject. Her response was to revert my message.[3]

On another talk page, she seems like she's being intentionally combative.[4] I ask her if she's trying to start a fight. [5] She claims that I'm the one who started the fight, by creating the page, and that I could end the fight by deleting it.[6] I give her a final notice to please apologize, or at least agree to stop this fight, or else I'd take it to arbitration.[7] Her response was to ask if I'd delete the page.[8]

So, we're here.

User:Bob drobbs: I state on my user-page that I am female, please refer to me as such.

As I assume the arb.com knows, David Collier has a blog he uses (among other things) to doxx any Wikipedia editor he disagree with. (No I will not link to any of that; arb.com-members: feel free to contact me for links iff you need it).

Bob drobbs then start an article about him; calling him a "political activist." The article is up for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Collier (political activist). I the mean time, Bob drobbs uses the fact that David Collier has an article as an argument that Collier's views are notable [9]

Please topic ban Bob drobbs from any further edits in the I/P area; the area is difficult enough as it is, we don't need this, Huldra (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DR Selfstudier (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All the way to the top? Why? - GizzyCatBella🍁 23:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)