Just out of curiosity, how do all the 30/500 socks on Wikipedia make their 1-character edits correcting spacing grammar/errors, etc.? I'm assuming it is automated or semi-automated, presumably through software programmes run outside of Wikipedia and interacting with the platform through accounts? Is that correct? Iskandar323 (talk) 06:38, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure tbh, could be automated or just dedicated manual editing. nableezy - 19:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

close Selfstudier (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not overly bothered about it but since the closer has left the door open for a different title, what do you think? It should be killings at least, no? Murder even.Selfstudier (talk) 13:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the move discussion closes with no consensus, how do we delete the redirect Palestinian citizens of Israel to allow the new page creation? RfD? Selfstudier (talk) 12:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You just edit it. nableezy - 15:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right:)Selfstudier (talk) 15:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In general, it is better to have a more fleshed out article prior to creating it. If this already included material on demographics, and income, and locations, and whatnot would be much more difficult to propose a move to a subtopic that currently has the majority of the article (identity). nableezy - 03:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit[1] on the 2013_Tapuah_Junction_stabbing page seems to be in violation of 1RR. You deleted the description of terrorist, and then after it was restored, added addtional qualifications.

Please revert your own change, and get consensus on the talk page before making any further changes. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

lol what? What did I revert there? nableezy - 20:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1) You deleted a long standing reference calling it a terror attack.

2) I restored this text

3) You added new text which had the effect of dramatically changing the meaning.

Reliable sources call it a "terror attack" and it was listed as such, you modified it to make it appear that only Israeli police were saying this. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 20:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding attribution, per the cited source, that was not there previously is not a revert. Please read what a revert is. Thanks. nableezy - 20:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Contentious labels section of the Manual of Style would also apply, so that the nature of the stabbing should be presented as a point of view rather than a fact.     ←   ZScarpia   09:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First you revert my change[2].

Then immediately after you delete a bunch of text that I that previously added[3].

This is in net-effect a violation of the 1RR.

Please undo those latest changes.

-- Bob drobbs (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to learn what the 1RR means. Consecutive edits are a single revert. As far as a bunch of text that [you] that previously added, if you dont make things up that the sources dont support others wont have to remove it. Maybe dont make things up that the sources dont support instead of asking that I restore some made up stuff that the sources dont suppot? nableezy - 23:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bob drobbs (talk) 23:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because you dont understand what consecutive edits means? Ok, thats cool. Will be bringing up your edit-warring and violation of WP:ONUS tho, fair warning. nableezy - 23:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob drobbs (talk • contribs) 00:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if you're going to report me, then report me. But I think your accusations are groundless.

But stop making threats implied or otherwise[4] [5]. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 22:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]