I agree with you 100%. The article is subject to repeated vandalism and I am concerned over the potential increase of it as the event draws near. The same thing happened with last year's event. The talk page practically became the unofficial forum. The main WrestleMania article as well as other articles on upcoming events have been repeatedly vandalized by anonymous users adding fan links and "live coverage links"(see WWE Vengeance [1] and [2]). One user even had the nerve to add an "official" site for WrestleMania 24!([3]) Unfortunately, any request made to have it Semi-Protected will more than likely be denied as the article has "insufficient content" to protect as said by one admin I talked to recently about this matter. Until then, it's up to us to keep it clean. -- bulletproof ^3:16 06:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just recently saw the Dragon Ball Z timlines page, and saw there was a short, pointless debate on the movies. I think that the DBZ movies fit into timline 4, or their own timlines. If you read the article, it makes sense that movies 7 8 and 9 would be in the 4th timline. I think it should be mentioned if you agree with me, and if you don't it should say the DBZ movies don't have any timline to fit into. I wanted to ask somone with more knowledge of DBZ before editing it.KojiDude 18:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the advice. You saved me alottttttt of time. lolKojiDude 04:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are invited to take part in a straw poll at the Majin Buu page to avoid another revert war with User:Wiki-star.--Orion Minor 23:47, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This will never... EVEEERRR end. Only because it centers on an anime-cruft article most admins couldn't give two flips about. Bank on it. Papacha 05:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well slap my arse and call me Shirley, I'm happy to have been wrong for once (ignore the first part, disavow the last, still good on the "Shirley"). Papacha 00:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, homes ... err... except for the first part... -- bulletproof ^3:16 00:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Don't look at me, I'm not the one who clicked on Last Measure. Blind links are bad... a *bad* BAD thing. Maybe you and I are the last of a dying breed that actually checks before they click. @_@ Papacha 00:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well you know you can't be too sure about those things these days... Never hurts to check, though. I remember once upon a time when you clicked on a link and it took you where you thought it would. Nowadays... you click on a link and you never know what you're going to get... "Fansite devoted to Cell" ... Good God NO! >_< -- bulletproof ^3:16 01:04, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snurk, snurk, snurk...

After doing a file report on WP:ANI that was lightly brushed away, administrators suggested taking the case to WP:ARB. The theory being, if User:Wiki-star is as bad as all out, he would shoot himslef in the foot (though he should be lookin' somethin' like the Black Knight by now). As a periphery, I don't feel it's right to act as a cornerstone. Would you organize it?

I'm posting this to several parties involved in this 'lil get-together at Majin Buu, so let them know if you get to it first or decline please. This looks to be our final measure. Papacha 06:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is removing a bunch of insults and conversation irrelevant to the topic vandalism? That other guy is the one who was vandalizing the talk page with his name-calling. I removed all that for a reason. Please don't just revert things because you think they're vandalism when they aren't. Thanks.

Daishokaioshin 16:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I already "stopped" and would have accepted your explanation without the threat of blocking. We've worked together to improve articles, even if we didn't specifically talk to each other about it, and have fought against TRUE vandals like Wiki-star. I respect you as an editor, but I don't like being threatened like that when I tried to approach you on the subject politely and calmly, and did NOT revert things back to the way they were before you reverted my changes. You may be used to dealing with all the Wiki-stars here on Wikipedia, but I am not one of them. Try to keep that in mind, please.

Daishokaioshin 16:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thanks for explaining that. Sorry if I came across as annoyed, but I don't like going straight from Wiki-star to someone else who decides he has something prove and starts flinging insults and poorly-conceived arguments at me because I mentioned that the Daizenshuu are not a canon source of information. They are extraneous, and whether the "fandom" (which tends to be full of wackos with all kinds of theories on this, that, and the other thing, that aren't backed up anywhere in canon) accepts them as true or not is of no consequence to me. I'm not interested in debating this point, however, except on my talk page, which I have attempted repeatedly to direct that other user towards. If you could assist in communicating with this other user if he continues his insult-throwing and refusal to drop the subject, I would appreciate it, as I don't need the stress that comes from trying to deal with stubborn and egotistical individuals. I edit on Wikipedia to improve Wikipedia. Not to have someone who doesn't know me try to tell me I don't have a life or whatever he was babbling about. Thanks for your time.

Daishokaioshin 16:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Wow, I see that Daishokaioshin is still the same conceited person... So now it's time for truth : I NEVER insulted anyone. That's a fact. Then, my arguments are undisputable (and the proof is that Dai' couldn't say anything more than insulting me). And I won't tolerate that Daishokaioshin tries to insult me again, for the 3rd time, after having polluted the talk page of the article, and my own talk page. Sorry Daishokaioshin, but this time you're wrong about the Daizenshû. That's all. It's not the end of the world, and anyway this matter doesn't deserve all this violence from you. You can't know everything about DB, even if you seem to know a great deal, you have your flaws. That's why we're on Wikipedia, meaning that everyone can give his share of correct things: we're simply not on your webpage, Dais', which would mean, whether you're right or wrong, that your point of view would be the only one. But here, there are other people than you, and they can also be right. I was right about the daizenshû, and, see, you're still alive. So why all these troubles ? Why do you have this need to insult people when they are right ?
  To 3bulletproof16, I don't need any warning, I'm the victim here, I was just trying to explain to Dais' that on Wikipedia, everybody has the right to have an opinion, even if it's not the same as some people who think they are the only one to know something Folken de Fanel 16:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry but I'm not stubborn, I just wanted apologies from Daishokaioshin for her insults on my page, not "apologies" in which she implies that I misunderstood her. I just asked her to remove the insults on my page and to apologize for these insults. I don't think it's much. Yet she refused to do so. Anyway, the problem is solved in a way, if she keeps her word she won't try to attack me anymore, I don't wan't much more than that. But before we can really close the "case" she has to apologize for having harassed me since yesterday. She can't do everything she want and then not facing the consequences. Folken de Fanel 18:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well well well, it seems you folks have another world of conflict other than in the Buu article. I don't want to interrupt, but i sincerely hope you folks don't take your misunderstandings to other contributors within thats article such as myself. Thanks for all your hard work! Wiki-star 19:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-star, you ARE interrupting. Please stay out of it.

3bulletproof16, just to clear something up, what you said about removing information from talk pages applies only to article talk pages and not user talk pages right? Because I removed all the insults and vandalism from Folken, and I don't want to get in trouble for vandalizing my own talk page, if that would go against the rules. Please clarify this for me when you have the chance.

Daishokaioshin 19:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I NEVER posted insults anywhere or vandalised anything. But maybe Daishokaioshin is going to explain us how your racial insults and vandalism on my own talk page is good for Wikipedia ?
  Seriously, Dais', vandalising 3bulletproof16's page in order to discredit me isn't going to help you. You said you didn't want to talk to me or hear from me anymore, then don't talk about me. Folken de Fanel 21:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Since Folken has decided to start being polite (mostly), even if he has begun denying that we ever spoke before (in addition to denying that he ever insulted me, which is dillusion as far as I'm concerned, considering he kept calling me a racist for mentioning that there may have been a communication barrier between us based on what language each of us is familiar with, amongst other things) I think that some progress can finally be made. He has tried a couple more times to start things with me, but I've shut him down by being polite and pointing out his own errors. He may not be a bad person, but he has left an impression on me, much like Wiki-star, that will take time to correct, through discussion and civility. Let's hope that he continues to be polite rather than resorting to name-calling, and such.

On the other subject you posted about, the DBZ wiki, I'm not sure how to go about it. Is there some place where one can get the source-code for producing one's own wiki project? Do you need a web server? It's going to be a lot of work to compile all the information about Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z on this thing. Should we draw upon wikipedia to start us off, and then work from there? What kind of rules are you thinking about, in terms of what content can be provided, what levels of canon to accept, etc.? Should extraneous and unreliable sources like the daizenshuu be included in an attempt to put correct information somewhere? Or is this going to be a compendium of "all-things-Dragon-Ball-regardless-of-canonicity"? A wiki isn't a place to post fan things, so having a fan fiction section where people can submit stories, while it would be appealing to me, since I am a writer, would not truly belong there. Thus other fan information shouldn't be included either. This would rule out any speculation or theories on how things work. If, however, you wanted to accept SOME speculation, since the Dragon Ball wiki wouldn't be bound by the same legal constraints as wikipedia...

Well, I think that's all I can come up with right now in terms of questions. I would be glad to help if you can get this thing running. It might be nice to have a place where intelligent people can go to provide information, without all the idiots who vandalize things here on wikipedia.

Daishokaioshin 17:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May you please tell me why you called my friends Batista vs, Mark Henry edits nonsense. He just called me and is pretty pissed that his work is being brushed aside. Both him and myself saw a commercial hyping this match while waiting for WWE Raw to come on. Other friends of minealso saw the commercial and are excited by the match. My friend went as far as to call you Wiki know it alls glory hounds. Brushing aside the info of a new user so you can take the edit, If thats true, thats pretty pathetic.User:Killswitch Engage

See the thing is that while you saw it, the rest of the country didn't. WWE deliberately releases its commercials and promos on future events, spoiling the outcomes of matches and whatnot, to the local media. This is stupidly done to attract the interest of fans in that local area. The same thing happened with the Vengeance DX promo. That promo spoiled the return of the DX at Vengeance as it was released roughly 2 months before Vengeance. Another thing is Wikipedia Policy which forbids the addition of spoilers as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. So please do not post spoilers until they are officially announced on either Raw, SmackDown!, and ECW or WWE.com. Thank you. -- bulletproof ^3:16 17:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, I reverted this edit of yours. WP:AIV is for intervention against vandalism, not sockpuppets. I'll look into it for you, of course, but I just wanted to explain why I reverted it. Cheers. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS} 22:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image I put in was fair use. Besides, the other pic looks crappy. --Trosk 17:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The new image you posted is not fair use. First of all, that image is copyrighted be WWE. And second, the image has a copyright violation as the person responsible for uploading it claims to be the creator of the work, which is obviously not true. -- bulletproof ^3:16 17:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I didn't know that. Also, why can't we just use that one? Most of the pictures on the page are from WWE anyway. --Trosk 20:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was a blatant copyvio, so it was deleted. Fair use images cannot be used in replacement of free images. The image on the page current is a free image. I'm afraid that's the end of the discussion. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS} 20:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But that pic sucks. You can barely tell it's a 300 pound guy! --Trosk 00:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not seeing the problem. --Trosk 00:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to read all of WP:FAIR if you disagree with my original assessment. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS} 08:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you ok with the World Title Match I added to the Schedualed Matches that I added?User:Killswitch Engage

Its cool, as long as it's legit and comes form an official source (Raw, SD!, ECW, WWE.com etc.) Just remember that Wikipedia is absolutely no place for fan rumors, gossip, spoilers, and other nonsense. If you could help me remind newcomers about the Crystal Ball Policy I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. -- bulletproof ^3:16 06:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How does the SSJ4 Gogeta image have "unknown copyright status"...? KojiDude 01:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The SSJ4 Gogeta image you uploaded (Image:GogetaSuperSaiyan4.jpg) has a copyright violation as the image is copyrighted by Toei Animation. The tag on your image claims that you are the creator of the work, which is obviously not true. Thus, it has a copyright violation. For more information on using correct copyright/license tags, please see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Hope that clears it up a bit. -- bulletproof ^3:16 02:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know where I could find an admin?...Preferably a really nice one. lol. I have a question that needs to be answered. KojiDude 22:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go on, then. I'm listening. --Lord Deskana (talk) 22:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Damn you're fast! -- -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes! --Lord Deskana (talk) 22:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have my talk page on your watchlist or something? -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. --Lord Deskana (talk) 22:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For vandalism checks right? -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really remember why. I think I added your userpage to my watchlist to check it for repeated User:Taracka vandalism. It adds the talk page too automatically. --Lord Deskana (talk) 22:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! I'm glad you remove vandalism from it. By all means keep it checked. -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

btw, how is good ol' Dragon Emperor (AKA -Taracka)? What's he been up to? -- bulletproof ^3:16 23:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing. He's sleeping off a nice long IP block at the minute. Seems to have shut him up. --Lord Deskana (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...Sweet... Oh, and thanks a lot for semi-protecting my page too! Anyways, sorry to interrupt guys. I'll let you two at it. After all... this is my talk page... -- bulletproof ^3:16 23:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...Jesus...You could've warned people not to click it in your edit summary or somthing.....I'm not trying to come off as rude here btw.....Just.......Man.....I'm never gonna get to sleep again... KojiDude 00:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're never gonna get sleep again? How in the blue hell do you think I feel!?!? And It's only the fourth time the IP has added the link! I wonder if he's into that sort of thing... eww... Now hold on a sec. You actually clicked on the link? lmao Dude... -- bulletproof ^3:16 00:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a "fan devoted to Cell" lmao. Was the screen jiggling all around? lol.-- bulletproof ^3:16 00:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...*In fedal position in corner with eally wide eyes*....*Slowly nods* KojiDude 00:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I bet Daishokaioshin clicked on the link as well! lmao, Imagine what she must have felt... -- bulletproof ^3:16 00:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lmao, we really shouldn't be laughing about this...lol...I didn't even know Daishokaioshin was a girl until a couple weeks ago. KojiDude 00:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, sort of caught me off guard. -- bulletproof ^3:16 01:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just got tired of people referring to me as a guy, so I wanted to make it clear I wasn't one. Sorry if I surprised you two or anything.

Daishokaioshin 01:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry dude... --Terrington 20:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prior to the conversation on the talk page, I had always maintained that Vegetto was most likely just SSJ, but that we can't know for sure. It was the concensus of other editors that made me start saying that Vegetto was SSJ2, because I go along with the decisions made on the talk pages. I was basing my reverts off of the fact that evidence seemed to be provided that Vegetto was SSJ2, or that the idea was acceptable enough that the article should be changed to reflect it. I still feel that Vegetto was most likely just SSJ1, so there's no problems here. I was just trying to stick to the decision made previously on the talk page with my reverts, not enforce my own perceptions of things on the article.

I doubt you thought I was doing that, but I just wanted to let you know. Thanks for your time. :)

Daishokaioshin 03:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt you were wondering, but just in case - I'm not 70.243.223.4, I only stepped in towards the end there. Voice of Treason 03:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know...The Masia has saved us! KojiDude (talk) 00:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallelujah, hallelujah, hallelujah, HA-LLE-LU-JAH!!!! -- bulletproof ^3:16 00:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lmao Hey, what if he comes back with sock puppets? It sounds like somthing Wiki-star would do... KojiDude (talk) 00:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry my son... I know of a lord... (whom I think you are familiar with)... The lord that vanished the Dragon Emperor infestation. See his miracles. It is Lord Deskana, and yes... ^{HE VALUES OUR OPINIONS} -- bulletproof ^3:16 01:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can't always get what you want. But if you try sometimes, well you just might find... you get what you need. Papacha 05:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well isn't that always true, my good friend... You know, kinda makes you wonder if he'd really clean up his act this time around... ... ... NAH... -- bulletproof ^3:16 06:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reported that imposter vandal at Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 2, but after an hour not a thing's been done about it. You'd figure identity theft would be carry a 'lil more weight, but I guess everybody's doing it these days. 3bulletproof16 06:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well everyone ALWAYS gets what's coming to them... (Wiki-star, Dragon Emperor, and so on...) Anyways, it's just a matter of time before the IP gets his. Nice touch with the little |3bulletproof16]] impersonation on your signature BTW, Papacha... almost as dramatic writing as Wiki-star -- bulletproof ^3:16 06:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It made me feel a little sorry for the dude, but not alot. And it was kinda corny how he used the Final Atonment title from the episode of DBZ where Vegeta kills himself...Almost takes away the coolness of the title. KojiDude (talk) 06:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that kind of killed it for me too... Oh well, whatever gives him a sense a drama... Keep up the good work Wiki-star! -- bulletproof ^3:16 06:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, seems I may have spoken a little too soon on the "gets what's coming to them" thing... [4] -- bulletproof ^3:16 07:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah? Well, I committed jaywalking TWO DAYS ago. You'll never take me alive, Wikipedia! Not even if you file an "RfC or something". Nyahh!!

Clemency will always get'cha. That, and the want of doing NOTHING. >_> Papacha 07:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to complain about it as well since he's doing it again. (update: 24hr block) Voice of Treason 10:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked? ...sweet... -- bulletproof ^3:16 15:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for reverting my userpage. Though I am rather flattered that I would be considered a Jimbo Wales sockpuppet. :) --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 23:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, just returning the favor.-- bulletproof ^3:16 00:41, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For several different reasons, though it was meant to be a flame. Voice of Treason 12:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Little does he know, we're not low class humans. No, we're actually saiyans. lol -- bulletproof ^3:16 15:11, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find your timing and motives a bit suspicious. The entry is currently going through an improvement phase with an admin, if you bother to read the talk page you will see a final form for the entry is being blocked by ONE user who is trying to insert a non NPOV, which is why deathphoenix is involved as an admin. There are other usenet groups that have entries on Wikipedia. I am going to request your proposal is removed. I'm sorry. TruthCrusader 17:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"highly suspicious"... No I am not affiliated with anyone involved in your apparent dispute, if that's what you mean by "highly suspicious". However what I am aware of is that the article lacks sufficient content to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Not only was the information there unreliable, but no sources were even cited. The article has also been subject to numerous edit wars even after an apparent consensus was made. The continuous disputes with yourself and whatever other parties involved are for you to handle so it is irrelevant to the AFD. But just because the article is being nominated for deletion does not mean it can't be improved. Like I said in the edit summary, feel free to edit it. Oh and BTW, if you're going to Requests for comment, I would highly suggest that you read the instructions listed at the top first and Sign entries with the date only, by using five tildes: ~~~~~.. -- bulletproof ^3:16 18:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not state you were affiliated with anyone. What I meant was is that you have never contributed anything to the entry, despite your so called involvement in the Wiki wrestling project, then you appear out of nowhere and slap an Afd on the entry, despite the obvious debate on the talk page between myself, an ADMIN, and the sole person who repeatedly tries to insert garbage in the article. I also suggest you review the other usenet entries on Wikipedia, many of them have even less content, you might want to slap Afd's on them too. TruthCrusader 18:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will look into that. It seems you are emotionally attached to the article. Please try to Assume good faith and read through WP:OWN before you make any more contributions. Thank you -- bulletproof ^3:16 18:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not place a warning flag on my page when no offense was made. Thank you. TruthCrusader 18:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Thank you. -- bulletproof ^3:16 18:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well for once I'm somewhat flattered that he actually addressed me this time. [5] Though I'm not too fond of him saying that he was going to kill me, I do, however, manage to find some comedic relief in all this at the thought of him attempting to kill me. Here's my analysis: He can't write at all so my guess is another Dragon Emperor "Sockpuppet". However, the IPs responsible for the recent vandalism are AOL trolls so there is a slim possibility that Wiki-star could indeed be making himself look like an ass again... -- bulletproof ^3:16 21:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably just an anon AOL vandal, don't pay him any attention. And if it's the known AOL vandal Wiki-star this does nothing for his case. Don't take the bait and make a big deal of it either way. Voice of Treason 22:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's kinda cute, actually. Like puppy love. If your puppy was retarded... Onikage725

"Ooh WOW, Three different languages... Well I happen to speak five: English, Spanish, Knowyourrollian, Shutyourmouthan, and yes, Canadian... ... ..."
Are knowyourollian and shutyourmouthan even real langueges? lol KojiDude (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Short for... "Know Your Role and Shut Your Mouth" -- bulletproof ^3:16 23:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lmao --KojiDude (talk) 23:10, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See ya man. Have fun in Seattle. KojiDude (talk) 02:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, threats is the fastest way to a perma-ban.--Orion Minor 23:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than put the source on every page, I used http://www.prowrestlinghistory.com/supercards/usa/wwf/wwfindex.html for the PPV ratings. I tend to trust them and their accuracy. TJ Spyke 05:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its cool but I just want you to know that none of the numbers on your website or any other web site are reliable as they all differ in the actual number. See...

• http://www.steveswrestling.com/info/wwebuyrates.html
• http://www.100megsfree4.com/wiawrestling/pages/wwf/wwfppvbr.htm
• http://www27.brinkster.com/mookieghana/wrestling/buyrates.htm

I hope that now you understand that the buyrates listed on websites are never accurate or even half accurate. That's why the section on the template has no use unless you want to invite vandals to add their nonsense. -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. The correct logo is the one I replaced on the article. The RAW and SmackDown! logos were just part of logo as seen in the Official SummerSlam 2005 promotional poster and on this site which if you hover your mouse over, its says that it is the 2005 logo. I would appriciate it if you didn't keep putting the incorrect logo back on the article. Alright, its not vandalism, but still, it's getting old reverting to the correct revision. If you could provide a source that says that your logo is more accurate, by all means provide it, because as it stands I can't find where your logo came from. 216.78.95.60 - Moe Epsilon 18:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raw and SD logos are always placed on posters and DVD covers to show what brand is promoting the event. You of all people should know this. After all, its not entitled "Raw Smackdown SummerSlam 2005". This better not be another WP:OWN thing...-- bulletproof ^3:16 20:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I got the fiesty one blocked for 48 hours. He's a persistant lil' troll, but I put up of list of the IPs he used. We shouldn't have much of a problem with him now, so the article's ammount of vandalism is going to go way down. KojiDude (talk) 19:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just got a new wireless mouse...Damn, this the pointer is so fast now. O_o...This is really annoying.--KojiDude (talk) 22:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye on it. Looks like Truth is gone for a little while. Tromboneguy0186 21:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to keep an eye on it, too, so let's hope things stay fine. Chad1m 22:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go read your project wrestling page I left a comment there.--TheTruth2 22:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a note about the Rock/Hogan cheers as I do feel it was notable and an actual part of the match. However, I must agree going into such areas as the Sharpshooter spot history is taking things a little too much. I'll help you keep an eye on him as well though. --Oakster ^(Talk) 22:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I have not gotten back sooner, Ihave got in after a night out...;o) I am in accord with you, and shall have a look at the whole matter tomorrow with a clearer head.:o)(Halbared 22:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Do you intead to go and remove trivia from every other article? I see no reason to remove the trivia section from WrestleMania articles when there are trivia sections in the Super Bowl articles, World Series articles, Stanley Cup articles, etc. Do you intend to go and remove their trivia sections as well? TJ Spyke 01:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No... Just Mania, not because I agree with McPhail ('cause I don't) but because I'm trying to keep the articles in consistency with one another. Unfortunately because of McPhail, the WrestleMania 22 article has never really been in consistency with the other ones... -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked him the same question. He still hasn't responded. I don't like how he seems to think it's ok for other major sports events to have trivia sections but not WrestleMania. TJ Spyke 05:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Do you still need help with this or is everything cool now? Normy132 06:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems OK now, but just in case anything goes wrong I think it might be a good idea to keep the page on your watchlist for now. Thanks a lot Normy132 -- bulletproof ^3:16 18:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added it to my watchlist. Not a problem helping out. Normy132 02:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just wante to point out that "Seven" is a word, not a arabic numeral. So X8 was the first one to use arabic and roman numerals together. TJ Spyke 20:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the parts about Giji Super Saiyan Broly?--KojiDude (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most other sites including myfavoritegames.com acknowledge that Goku was the only one who achieved the transformation [6] and since there is no mention or evidence of Broly reaching the form in any notable source then it's safe to say that his transformation was just fan speculation. Remember the Bio-Oozaru thing? Hope that clears it up. -- bulletproof ^3:16 21:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It did, thanks. And you don't have to add your comments to my talk page if you don't want to, I have yours on my watchlist (why it's on there I can't remember).--KojiDude (talk) 21:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but it's kinda my thing, you know? -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How did they screw up my coordinates settings for the infobox... I put it up before that other coordinates setting on arenas page and it used to work. Now there is no audit trail for these other people who put up coordinates and mine have been completely disabled. Do you kn ow anything?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr who1975 (talk • contribs)

Huh? I made a change to it but I reverted it back to your version... If something's wrong then it's probably from your version. -- bulletproof ^3:16 02:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... I was confused.--Dr who1975 03:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please sign this? They're trying to change wikipedia in a way that destroys the "Anyone can edit" motto. It's a really stupid idea in my opinion.--KojiDude (talk) 19:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I just asked him on his talk page why he reverted all the the changes I made. TJ Spyke 19:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Glad to help. -- bulletproof ^3:16 20:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've semi-protected it for now. Do any other pages need it? If he does that on a range of pages,maybe a range block is needed. Circeus 02:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The user is still very active. -- bulletproof ^3:16 21:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I know how frustrating it is when trolls keep messing with articles for no reason and don't know how to follow guidelines. TJ Spyke 20:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me 'bout it. I deal with them everyday... Just check my Contribs...-- bulletproof ^3:16 20:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like he got temporarily banned, maybe this will calm him down. TJ Spyke 21:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully...-- bulletproof ^3:16 21:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily blocked. --Lord Deskana (talk) 21:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure thats what he meant.-- bulletproof ^3:16 21:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure. I was just noting the difference. See Wikipedia:Blocking policy and Wikipedia:Banning policy. --Lord Deskana (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... Noted.-- bulletproof ^3:16 21:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, KojiDude recently alerted me of an apparent new policy [7] in the making: Wikipedia:Stable versions. I was wondering if you've heard anything about it. Just asking since it has something to do with vandalism, apparently. -- bulletproof ^3:16 21:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for rv. vandalism--TheTruth2 23:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Always glad to help. -- bulletproof ^3:16 23:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's official, Dragon Emperor has no life whatsoever.--KojiDude 16:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another Wikibreak? So soon?--KojiDude 05:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tell you what... We'll see how today goes. -- bulletproof ^3:16 15:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep putting that when you edit the Unforgiven/Armageddon pages? The infobox template doesn't say how to lists multiple brands so I see no reason to keep changing it. TJ Spyke 21:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its called consistency and besides "/" sticks out like a sore thumb. Use "<br>" instead for a cleaner look to the infobox. -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Were these pages actually merged or did you just create a new page and make both of them re-directs? I checked the talk pages of both and there was no mention of a possible merger, and no vote for it. TJ Spyke 06:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We agreed on the Wikiproject's talk page that only the "Big Four" PPVs would stay unmerged. [8] -- bulletproof ^3:16 20:17, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm more than happy to help. TJ Spyke 04:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to make any more edits, but I at least cleaned it up a little. I agree that it looked like a mess before. TJ Spyke 04:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to have to put all 22 WrestleMania's on my watchlist, but it looks like I might have to because the WrestleMania 21 article is just as bad. TJ Spyke 04:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a suggestion, you might want to create the account User:3buIIetproof16 (a Username that uses caiptal i's instead of lowercase l's) to keep Taracka from making it. I doubt he's that smart, though...--KojiDude 02:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KojiDude, I'm not going to lie to you. If Taracka ever finds the testicular fortitude to go and do something as stupid as that, it would be the absolute most hilarious thing I've ever seen on Wikipedia. Of course, most of the hilariousness would be from seeing his ass get banned again instantly for the 1000th time. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I think of it, it would be pretty damn hilarious to see him try that.--KojiDude 04:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, replying on both pages is my thing... Hehe... -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This thing with TJ Spyke has been going on for 14 hours now...How long am I gonna have to stay up arguing with him? I need my beauty sleep, man!--KojiDude 04:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this is getting to be horsecrap. I am getting sick and tired of a notable edit being unnecessarily removed on both the Trump Plaza page AND the WWE RAW page. WrestleMania IV and WrestleMania V were in 1988 and 1989 respectively. Until WWE RAW returned there, 17 years went by before any WWE television broadcast emanated from there. That is a notable fact and should be included within Wikipedia not only on the Trump Plaza page, but also the WWE RAW page as well.

Tell me something, if it wasn't so notable, then why was that fact acknowledged on WWE RAW itself on August 28? Both Jerry Lawler and Jim Ross both made remarks about WrestleMania's IV and V being held there.

These unnecessary edits are pure horsecrap! Srosenow 98 05:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look. WP:IAR is one of the fundamental official policies of the whole project, as promulgated by Jimbo himself. Nominating it for deletion is a pretty clear violation of WP:POINT.

I accept that Koji meant well, but a block was called for.

Part of being an admin is knowing when to IAR, and when not to. DS 01:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bulletproof, he's right. Breaking a rule you didn't know exsisted always calls for a block.--KojiDude 04:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You asked for my opinion on this, and I thought I'd reply to this here (contrary to my normal policy on replying on my talk page). As easy as it would be for me to say "It was only three hours", I know I'd be annoyed if I felt a block was applied to me unjustly. To be honest, I'm not really sure what to say. It seemed Koji was beginning to revert war (cause Koji reverted someone that reverted Koji's action)... but perhaps the block was a bit premature, I don't know. I've got to say though, nominating IAR for deletion is a very bad idea. My advice to Koji (and you) is to forget about it. Nobody should hold any grudges. And if they do hold a grudge, then they need to learn to move on from things. --Lord Deskana (talk) 15:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying I'm going to hold a grudge on the admin who blocked him at all. I just thought, like you said, the block was a bit premature. I think it's always a good idea to warn a user when they are doing something they're not supposed to. So if they persist, at least they know what they're doing is wrong and they can be blocked for blatant vandalism. Kojidude was not warned at all. I believe an edit war could have been avoided if Kojidude was simply warned. But that's just my opinion. Thanks anyways though. -- bulletproof ^3:16 15:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Koji should have been warned... but to be honest, if Koji knew doing that was a bad plan, an immidiate block was probably appropriate. It's hard to say sometimes, and this is one of those "hard to say" cases. If you need anything else, ask :-) --Lord Deskana (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well thank you very much. its always nice to know your work's being appreciated. but i cant take the credit for the layout of the table, i just copied the InuYasha one. do you think i included the right characters? Plough | talk to me 23:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Several users say that Dave Batista's Theme Song for WWE is "Unleashed". Several more, including yourself, say it is "I walk alone". Which is it? (For some reason, google is not working for meh right now. So please be honest, i have no way of checking! I will believe whatever you say!)--Cookie 05:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you very much for clearing that up. I now know which one is right hehe ^^ I sincerely apologize for reverting your edits, i screwed up, my bad. Lol! Thanks once again! --Cookie 07:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]