Cannabis

Content deleted Content added
114.18.93.166 (talk)
Tag: Reverted
m Reverted edits by 114.18.93.166 (talk) to last version by Lowercase sigmabot III
Line 52: Line 52:
:::{{U|Dank}} - My, unpardonable, error, for which I apologise! And greatly appreciate the offer. SchroCat's comments have sparked a flurry of interest, so it should be alright, but I shall certainly take up the offer if necessary. Thanks again. [[User:KJP1|KJP1]] ([[User talk:KJP1|talk]]) 13:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
:::{{U|Dank}} - My, unpardonable, error, for which I apologise! And greatly appreciate the offer. SchroCat's comments have sparked a flurry of interest, so it should be alright, but I shall certainly take up the offer if necessary. Thanks again. [[User:KJP1|KJP1]] ([[User talk:KJP1|talk]]) 13:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Any time. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 13:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Any time. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 13:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

== Why are you re-inforcing edits made by undisclosed paid accounts? ==

[[Edward Windsor, Lord Downpatrick]] is being constantly edited by [[WP:UPE]]s and their socks, based on the article's edit history ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edward_Windsor,_Lord_Downpatrick&diff=prev&oldid=1154011486 1]), ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edward_Windsor,_Lord_Downpatrick&diff=prev&oldid=1182573866 2]), ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edward_Windsor,_Lord_Downpatrick&diff=prev&oldid=1189775820 3]). That user is literally restoring the same edits that were reverted by previous socks. [[Special:Contributions/114.18.93.166|114.18.93.166]] ([[User talk:114.18.93.166|talk]]) 19:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:56, 4 May 2024

"doing what little one can to increase the general stock of knowledge is as respectable an object of life, as one can in any likelihood pursue" Charles Darwin
Articles seeking peer review
before featured article candidacy
Unanswered peer reviews

New FAC and PR

To any friendly talk page watchers, I have:

If there is anyone who fancies commenting, I would be grateful. Cheers - SchroCat (talk)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 16 June 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! With Gately you have a back to back TFA!—Wehwalt (talk) 23:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Double showing? Don't think I've had one of those before. Cheers, Wehwalt. - SchroCat (talk) 08:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Piles of stones

Morning Schrocat - hope you are keeping well. You're certainly busy! The Secretum seems to be doing just fine without my two'pennorth, but I shall offer comments re. On Her Majesty's Secret Service. If you've time and inclination, I'd very much appreciate an extra pair of eyes at the FAC for Grade I listed buildings in England completed in the 20th century. It's currently enjoying one Support, and green lights from the Accessibility and Image reviews, but comments have now slowed to a crawl. All well here, although the builders are rather distracting. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 08:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Morning KJP1, it would be a pleasure: I shall be along there shortly for a look. Great to hear all is good there, and I hope the distractions all have a silver lining! Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 08:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I had a look too (it's at WP:FLC! We get ignored and/or confused with FAC a lot, and I haven't figured out yet how I feel about that ... probably proud). It looks like you're sailing to victory, but if not, give me a ping. - Dank (push to talk) 11:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dank - My, unpardonable, error, for which I apologise! And greatly appreciate the offer. SchroCat's comments have sparked a flurry of interest, so it should be alright, but I shall certainly take up the offer if necessary. Thanks again. KJP1 (talk) 13:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any time. - Dank (push to talk) 13:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply