Volumetric pricing is a pricing strategy frequently used by the public utilities (e.g., water and power tariffs) where the fixed costs of the service are recovered proportionally to the amount of use. For example, under this approach a per-kWh pricing of an electric utility includes a small share of the monthly fixed cost of the utility, fixed (say, monthly) charges for the service are either absent of inconsequential.
The volumetric pricing, in addition to the easy-to-understand structure, encourages the customers to lower the use of the resource. For example, if the (very significant) fixed costs of the electricity service were recovered through the monthly fixed payments, then the per-unit price would have been much lower thus encouraging additional consumption.[1]
Conversely, the volumetric price disincentivizes the utility from investing in conservation: if the customers will use less of the resources, the utility sales and will shrink, reducing the fixed-cost portion and causing the lost revenues and under-investment. Therefore this pricing strategy is typically coupled at the regulatory level with an annual rate adjustment mechanism (also known as revenue-decoupling policy).[1]
Volumetric pricing requires metering that can be expensive to implement, especially in the case of irrigation, alternatives include:[2][3][4]
- flat rate;
- per-area pricing, coupled with tiered pricing;
- a system of water rights or quotas;
- input pricing as a percentage of the cost of certain input(s), e.g., seed;
- output pricing as a percentage of product sales.
For the electricity services, the number of alternatives is larger, Borenstein[5] provides a review of the ways that can be used by the electric utilities to recover the fixed costs.
See also[edit]
- Dimensional weight (also called volumetric weight)
References[edit]
- ^ a b Prindle, Zarnikau & Allis 2010, p. 217.
- ^ Yacov Tsur (30 September 2010). Pricing Irrigation Water: Principles and Cases from Developing Countries. Routledge. pp. 165–. ISBN 978-1-136-52375-5.
- ^ Thomas, Manoj T.; Ballabh, Vishwa (11 March 2008). "Recovery of Irrigation User Cess and Governance of Canal Systems". In Vishwa Ballabh (ed.). Governance of Water: Institutional Alternatives and Political Economy. SAGE Publishing India. p. 98. ISBN 9789352800971.
- ^ Giannoccaro, Giacomo; Prosperi, Maurizio; Giacomo, Zanni (2010). "Assessing water pricing policies to enhance water efficiency in agriculture" (PDF). Ambientalia. ISSN 1699-3063.
- ^ Borenstein 2016.
Sources[edit]
- Prindle, Bill; Zarnikau, Jay; Allis, Erica (2010). "Barriers and Policy Solutions to Energy Efficiency as a Carbon Emissions Reduction Strategy". Generating Electricity in a Carbon-Constrained World. Elsevier. pp. 207–239. doi:10.1016/B978-1-85617-655-2.00008-0.
- Borenstein, Severin (September 2016). "The economics of fixed cost recovery by utilities" (PDF). The Electricity Journal. 29 (7): 5–12. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2016.07.013. ISSN 1040-6190.
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction