You posted on my page:

• "Your recent edit to Transgender health care seemed less than neutral and has been removed.

But gave no details as to why - so in answer to you offer to give details -yes I would be very grateful to hear them. The reason you gave in the page Talk seems unfounded:

• "This page is not here to try to whitewash conversion therapy, which is widely condemned worldwide."

Please do give your reasons in the Talk for Transgender Health. ThxPeckedagain (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons are, as the edit summary indicated, violations of neutral POV. A lot of the changes, such as your edit-warring change to the lead to try to make things appear more controversial than they are, violate our neutrality of view. While the UK has taken a large backstep in transgender health care, this has not been universally observed in the rest of the world, so it is WP:UNDUE to ram the Uk's decision into every transgender article on Wikipedia to do so. You've also removed large amounts of well sourced information without consensus to do so.

As for the other one on Transgender health care trying to whitewash Conversion therapy#Gender exploratory therapy - it is undue for the article on Transgender health care in the way you added it, again violating NPOV (and UNDUE in this case) - it is instead already discussed at length at Conversion therapy in the appropriate context of what it is, so at best, a link to there may be added, but even that is questionable, as the practice of conversion therapy is not generally considered health care. Raladic (talk) 23:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]