Responding to user message
[edit]Yes, that's odd. But I glanced through my edits in 2007 and couldn't find any point where I discussed Barack Obama. Are you sure? Fishal (talk) 12:36, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm quite sure of it, in fact here's how the exchange went:
"And yet you see no problem with subjective sentences in the article such as, "Time magazine's Joe Klein wrote that the book 'may be the best-written memoir ever produced by an American politician.'" or, "...Time magazine named him one of 'the world's most influential people.'" as long as he is praised, eh? Blarvink (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)", he said.
"Yes this is outright hype. Some 'fan' got carried away. Strike all these 'fan' statements. They denigrate Wikipedia enormously. I am amused that everyone considers "most liberal" to be a criticism. Let's just add a statement like, "The American Conservative Union rated Obama's voting record as the most liberal of any Senator in 2007 (cite). Fishal (talk) 14:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)," you replied.
I thought about how I'd definitely want to know about that sort of thing if it happened to me, out of morbid curiosity, and decided to mention t to you. BetweenCupsOfTea (talk) 20:07, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Wow, that is a bit harrowing to think about. Thanks for reaching out. Fishal (talk) 13:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
BetweenCupsOfTea, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi BetweenCupsOfTea! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/WP_teahouse_logo_3.png/40px-WP_teahouse_logo_3.png)
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 16:25, 14 December 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your thread has been archived
[edit]![]() |
Hi BetweenCupsOfTea! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
[edit]![]() |
Hi BetweenCupsOfTea! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
@BetweenCupsOfTea: Good day, fellow editor. I did caught you've been edited for the main page of the Philippine adaptation of I Can See Your Voice. But i just wanna have to thank you for "cleaning up" the page. Let me explain the definition of ICSYVPH.
Alternate terms
[edit]- SING-vestigator (a portmanteau of the words "sing" and "investigator"), a group of celebrity detectives or panelists.
- SEE-cret songer (a portmanteau of words "see" and "secret", "song" and "singer"), a group of secret singers or mystery singers.
- SEE-nger (playing on the word "singer"), a good singer.
- SEE-ntunado (playing on the word "sintunado"), a bad singer.
- Eyeward (a portmanteau of words "eye" and "award"), a trophy given by a guest artist(s) (a.k.a. music superstar) if the last mystery singer standing is a good singer.
Gameplay changes
[edit]- In the inaugural first season, it is composed of six mystery singers and the three-round cycle refers to visual — lip-sync — evidence, starting with Stop, Looks, and Listen — The Voice is Synching — I Like to Prove It! Prove It! or Play it by Hear.
- In the second season, the three-round cycle has changed to Two or False — The Voice is Synching — Play it by Hear.
- In the third season, the number of mystery singers were reduced to five, but the three-round cycle being swapped to lip-sync — visual — evidence, starting with Everybody Sync (an American-esque lip-sync round) — Two or False — Play it by Hear.
Makoy Canlas (talk) 03:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nagat El-Sagheera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction