| Lane v. Wilson | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 3, 1939 Decided May 22, 1939 | |
| Full case name | Lane v. Wilson et al. |
| Citations | 307 U.S. 268 (more) 59 S. Ct. 872; 83 L. Ed. 1281 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 98 F.2d 980 (10th Cir. 1938); cert. granted, 305 U.S. 591 (1938). |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Frankfurter, joined by Hughes, Stone, Roberts, Black, Reed |
| Dissent | McReynolds, Butler |
| Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Lane v. Wilson, 307 U.S. 268 (1939), was a United States Supreme Court case that found a 12-day one-time voter registration window to be discriminatory for black citizens and repugnant to the Fifteenth Amendment.[1]
Background
[edit]In 1915, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Guinn v. United States that a grandfather clause to Oklahoma's literacy test for voting was unconstitutional, violating the Fifteenth Amendment. In response, the Oklahoma legislature passed a law giving citizens of the state a 12-day period, from April 30 to May 11, 1916, in which they were allowed to register to vote. Individuals who missed that registration period would be barred permanently from voting. But, a grandfather clause exempting citizens who had voted in 1914, that is, before Guinn, largely exempted white voters from the provisions of the narrow registration window.[2][3][4] In practice the registration period worked against black citizens.
I. W. Lane, a black citizen of Oklahoma, was banned from voting under Oklahoma's rules, and sued for $5,000 in damages. The district court found against him, and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ruling of the district court.[5] Lane appealed to the US Supreme Court.
Decision
[edit]Justice Frankfurter delivered the ruling of the court, which held that Oklahoma's registration window and grandfather clause violated the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[6]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Lane v. Wilson, 307 U.S. 268 (1939).
- ^ Carp, Robert A; Stidham, Ronald; Manning, Kenneth L (February 1, 2013). Judicial Process in America, 9th Edition. CQ Press. pp. 297–. ISBN 9781452226323. Retrieved November 2, 2014.
- ^ Cortés, Carlos E. (September 3, 2013). Multicultural America: A Multimedia Encyclopedia. SAGE Publications. pp. 986–. ISBN 9781452276267. Retrieved November 2, 2014.
- ^ Pauley, Garth E. (2007). LBJ's American Promise: The 1965 Voting Rights Address. Texas A&M University Press. pp. 33–. ISBN 9781585445813. Retrieved November 2, 2014.
- ^ Lane v. Wilson, 98 F.2d 980 (10th Cir. 1938).
- ^ Baldino, Thomas Joseph; Kreider, Kyle L. (2010). Of the People, by the People, for the People: A Documentary Record of Voting Rights and Electoral Reform. ABC-CLIO. pp. 194–. ISBN 9780313385506. Retrieved November 2, 2014.
External links
[edit]
Works related to Lane v. Wilson at Wikisource- Text of Lane v. Wilson, 307 U.S. 268 (1939) is available from: Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction