![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/41/Jar%27Edo_Wens_contributor.png/220px-Jar%27Edo_Wens_contributor.png)
Jar'Edo Wens was a deliberately fictitious Wikipedia article which existed for almost 10 years before being spotted in November 2014 and deleted in March 2015. At the time, it was the longest-lasting hoax article discovered in the history of Wikipedia.
Origin
[edit]The "Jar'Edo Wens" article was created on May 29, 2005. It was only two sentences in length and cited no sources. It claimed to be about an Australian Aboriginal god "of earthly knowledge and physical might, created by Altjira to ensure that people did not get too arrogant or self-conceited" that "is associated with victory and intelligence." It was likely simply the name "Jared Owens", with different spacing, punctuation, and casing.[1][2][3][4][5]
The author, an unregistered user at an Australian IP address,[4] was active for eleven minutes in May 2005; their only other contribution was to also add "Yohrmum" (likely being a re-spelling of "Your mum") to a list of Australian deities. This was more quickly spotted and removed, but it was almost a decade before the "Jar'Edo Wens" article was detected and deleted.
Spread
[edit]During its nearly decade-long existence, the "Jar'Edo Wens" hoax article was translated into other language editions of Wikipedia, including French, Polish, Russian, and Turkish. Two language editions additionally included the shorter-lived "yohrmum" page. An entry was also created on Wikidata.
The hoax was unwittingly copied into a book on atheism in 2012, as part of a list of 500 "gods and religions in history that have fallen out of favour".[5][6]
Discovery
[edit]The hoax lasted nine years, nine months, and three days on Wikipedia.[7] New article creation was later restricted to registered users after the Seigenthaler incident in September 2005; although this made new fake articles more difficult to establish, existing hoax articles (especially low-trafficked ones) could more easily go unnoticed.[8]
In 2009, the article was tagged with the classification "multiple issues", including a lack of sources.[9] However, it was only in November 2014 that the article was flagged as a possible hoax. It was finally proposed for deletion on March 1, 2015, and the deletion was confirmed two days later by an administrator. Wikipediocracy, a website for Wikipedia criticism, publicised the hoax on March 15, 2015,[10] after which it was widely reported by more general news sites.[4]
See also
[edit]- Archived Jar'Edo Wens hoax on Wikipedia
- Deletion discussion on Wikipedia
- List of hoaxes on Wikipedia
- Citogenesis
References
[edit]- ^ "The story behind Jar'Edo Wens, the longest-running hoax in Wikipedia history". Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 19, 2015. Retrieved September 1, 2017.
- ^ Caitlin Dewey, Washington Post (April 17, 2015). "The story of Jar'Edo Wens, the longest-running Wikipedia hoax, and why it's so hard to police the free encyclopedia - National Post". National Post. Archived from the original on April 18, 2015.
- ^ Caitlin Dewey (April 17, 2015). "The Wikipedia hoax that lasted nearly 10 years". The Hamilton Spectator. Archived from the original on October 14, 2015. Retrieved April 18, 2015.
- ^ a b c "Aussie's Jar'Edo Wens prank sets new record as Wikipedia's longest-running hoax". The Sydney Morning Herald. March 23, 2015. Archived from the original on July 1, 2015. Retrieved April 18, 2015.
- ^ a b Cush, Andy. "How One Man Made Himself Into an Aboriginal God With Wikipedia". Weird Internet. Gawker Media. Archived from the original on July 9, 2015.
- ^ McCormick, Matthew S. (2012). "Five Hundred Dead Gods and the Problems of Other Religions". Atheism and the Case Against Christ. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 9781616145828. Archived from the original on August 3, 2020. Retrieved May 10, 2021.
- ^ Debra L. Merskin (November 12, 2019). The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society. SAGE Publications. p. 1900. ISBN 978-1-4833-7554-0. Archived from the original on June 24, 2021. Retrieved June 23, 2021.
- ^ Goodin, Dan (December 6, 2005). "False claim has Wikipedia revising article-creation rules". Seattle Times. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved October 5, 2015.
- ^ Peter Bodkin (March 23, 2015). "Wikipedia's longest-lived hoax has finally been outed". TheJournal.ie. Yahoo News UK & Ireland. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved May 10, 2021.
- ^ "Jared Owens, God of Wikipedia". Wikipediocracy. March 16, 2015. Archived from the original on August 16, 2019. Retrieved August 16, 2019.
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction