Part of a series on
Anthropology
Outline History
Types Archaeological Biological Cultural Linguistic Social
Archaeological Aerial Aviation Battlefield Biblical Bioarchaeological Environmental Ethnoarchaeological Experiential Feminist Forensic Maritime Paleoethnobotanical Zooarchaeological
Biological Anthrozoological Biocultural Evolutionary Forensic Molecular Neurological Nutritional Paleoanthropological Primatological
Social Cultural Applied Art Cognitive Cyborg Development Digital Ecological Environmental Economic Political economy Feminist Food Historical Institutional Kinship Legal Media Medical Museums Musical Political Psychological Public Religion Symbolic Transpersonal Urban Visual
Linguistic Anthropological Descriptive Ethnological Ethnopoetical Historical Semiotic Sociological
Research framework Anthropometry Ethnography cyber Ethnology Cross-cultural comparison Participant observation Holism Reflexivity Thick description Cultural relativism Ethnocentrism Emic and etic
Key concepts Culture Development Ethnicity Evolution sociocultural Gender Kinship and descent Meme Prehistory Race Society Value Colonialism / Postcolonialism
Key theories Actor–network theory Alliance theory Cross-cultural studies Cultural materialism Culture theory Diffusionism Feminism Historical particularism Boasian anthropology Functionalism Interpretive Performance studies Political economy Practice theory Structuralism Post-structuralism Systems theory
Lists Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology by year Bibliography Journals List of indigenous peoples Organizations

Historical particularism (coined by Marvin Harris in 1968)^[1] is widely considered the first American anthropological school of thought.

Closely associated with Franz Boas and the Boasian approach to anthropology, historical particularism rejected the cultural evolutionary model that had dominated anthropology until Boas. It argued that each society is a collective representation of its unique historical past. Boas rejected parallel evolutionism, the idea that all societies are on the same path and have reached their specific level of development the same way all other societies have.^[2] Instead, historical particularism showed that societies could reach the same level of cultural development through different paths.^[2]

Boas suggested that diffusion, trade, corresponding environment, and historical accident may create similar cultural traits.^[2] Three traits, as suggested by Boas, are used to explain cultural customs: environmental conditions, psychological factors, and historical connections, history being the most important (hence the school's name).^[2]

Critics of historical particularism argue that it is anti-theoretical because it doesn't seek to make universal theories, applicable to all the world's cultures. Boas believed that theories would arise spontaneously once enough data was collected. This school of anthropological thought was the first to be uniquely American and Boas (his school of thought included) was, arguably, the most influential anthropological thinker in American history.

References[edit]

Further reading[edit]

• Calhoun, Craig J., ed. (2002). "historical particularism". Dictionary of the social sciences. Oxford University Press. p. 212. ISBN 978-0-19-512371-5.
• Card, Claudia (1996). The unnatural lottery: character and moral luck. Temple University Press. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-56639-453-6.
• Darnell, Regna (2001). Invisible genealogies: a history of Americanist anthropology. University of Nebraska Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-8032-6629-2.
• Sanderson, Stephen K. (1997). "Historical particularism". In Barfield, Thomas (ed.). The dictionary of anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 237. ISBN 978-1-57718-057-9.