![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Bodleian_Libraries%2C_C%C3%A6dmon_Manuscript_1.jpg/220px-Bodleian_Libraries%2C_C%C3%A6dmon_Manuscript_1.jpg)
Genesis A (or Elder Genesis) is an Old English poetic adaptation of about the first half of the biblical book of Genesis. The poem is fused with a passage known today as Genesis B, translated and interpolated from the Old Saxon Genesis.
Genesis A (and B) survive in the Junius Manuscript, which has been held in the Bodleian Library at the University of Oxford since 1677.
Lacunae
[edit]The sole manuscript containing Genesis A is incomplete, with a number of leaves missing. This means that, as we have it today, there are gaps (lacunae) in the poem. Paul G. Remley has estimated the number of missing lines thus:[1]
text | lines |
---|---|
Genesis A | 1-168 |
lacuna | 62 |
Genesis A | 169-205 |
lacuna | no detectable textual loss |
Genesis A | 206-34 |
lacuna | 70 |
Genesis B | 235-441 |
lacuna | 116 |
Genesis B | 442-851 |
Genesis A | 852-2045 |
lacuna | no detectable textual loss |
Genesis A | 2046-381 |
lacuna | 20 |
Genesis A | 2382-418 |
lacuna | 61 |
Genesis A | 2419-512 |
lacuna | 18 |
Genesis A | 2513-99 |
lucuna | 36 |
Genesis A | 2600-806 |
lacuna | 19 |
Genesis A | 2807-2936 |
The total length of the combined Genesis A and B poems when the junius Manuscript was complete was therefore around 3339 lines.
Summary
[edit]Genesis A begins before Biblical Genesis—not with the creation of the world but with the creation of Heaven and the angels and with Satan's war on Heaven.[2] Then the poet describes the days of creation, culminating with the creation of Adam and a description of the Garden of Eden.[3] After this, the poem scholars call Genesis B resumes the story of Adam in the Garden,[4] while also going back to the war on Heaven Genesis A already discussed.[5] Following the material from Genesis B, the poem is a fairly close translation of the Biblical book of Genesis up to and including the sacrifice of Isaac (Genesis 22.13).
Textual background
[edit]Scholars consider the poem in the Junius manuscript of separate authorship than Genesis B, though both are presented concurrently in the Junius Manuscript.[6] Charles Leslie Wrenn even considers Genesis A to be a composite work.[7]
Scholars such as Wrenn once considered the work to be partially written by Cædmon,[7] though as far back as Laurence Michel in 1947 there were critics: he calls the attribution based on "circumstantial evidence" and that any connection "may be laid to the prevalence of well-known pious introductory formulas".[8]
Editions and translations
[edit]The editions and translations of Genesis A include:
- Krapp, George Philip, ed. (1931), The Junius Manuscript, The Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records: A Collective Edition, New York: Columbia University Press, ISBN 9780231087650, OCLC 353894. https://web.archive.org/web/20181206091232/http://ota.ox.ac.uk/desc/3009
- Doane, A. N. (ed.), Genesis A: A New Edition (Madison, Wisconsin, 1978)
- Genesis A & B are edited along with digital images of their manuscript pages, and translated, in the Old English Poetry in Facsimile Project eds. Foys, Martin et al. (University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2019-)
- Aaron K. Hostetter's translation
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Paul G. Remley, Old English Biblical Verse: Studies in Genesis, Exodus and Daniel (XXXXX), p. 94 fn. 1.
- ^ lines 1-102
- ^ lines 103-234
- ^ Genesis B, lines 235-245
- ^ Genesis B, lines 246 ff
- ^ Killings, Douglas B. (1 August 1996). Codex Junius 11. Retrieved 17 March 2015 – via Project Gutenberg.
This work is generally believed to be a composite of two separate poems . . . The reason for this interpolation is not known. Perhaps the original compiler preferred the version of the story presented in "Genesis B", or perhaps the text of "Genesis A" from which he was working with was missing this section.
- ^ a b Wrenn, C.L. (1967). A Study of Old English Literature. New York: Norton. p. 99. ISBN 978-0393097689.
- ^ Michel, Laurence (1947). "Genesis A and the Praefatio". Modern Language Notes. 62 (8): 545–550. doi:10.2307/2908618. JSTOR 2908618.
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction