I drew a musical instrument classification chart in GIMP, and then ported it to Inkscape, and then I got a professional graphic artist to help with making the layout look nicer, but unfortunately the graphic artist uses commercial software on a microsoft computer, so the resulting file doesn't seem to any longer be compatible with uploading to Wikimedia Commons.
I also tried loading into Inkscape and then re-saving it, but the result still does not upload to Wikimedia Commons.
To get my drawing out from behind the copper curtain of MicrosoftAdobe and into the Free World, here is a screen capture as a bitmap image.
If anyone has any better suggestions, please advise.
Here's a link to a high-resolution version of one of the images, often cited and used on its own, contained in it.
NOTE: The subtitles "Earth", "Water", "Air", "Fire", and "Idea" are misleading and should not be considered accurate representations of their corresponding state of matter. This chart connects the five classical elements (from Aristotle) to states of matter, proper only in such instrumental organology and not physically accurate. It should be clarified that, in contrast to what is stated in the image, fire is indeed not a plasma, fire is a chemical reaction that is not composed of matter, thus is not categorized under any state of matter and is only visual, not physical. Plasma is a special gas state that contains interacting ions (charged particles) as opposed to non-interacting particles. Unlike what the image suggests, plasma is not merely an electrically charged gas, nor a "fire".
Furthermore, "Quintessance" should be spelled "Quintessence", and is not a "process" nor "procedure", but rather is a denotation of the vacuum energy responsible for the expansion of the universe (dark energy). With that said, it is physical and is limited to space. Its corresponding to the Quintephone is not clear. For Mann, electronic instruments, i.e. electrophones, are a proper subset of quintephones, but the category quintephone is necessary to describe computational sound synthesizers that operate by other-than-electrical means, such as synthesizers that work using optical computing. They generate their sound informatically with no apparent relation to physic's Quintessence other than the shared prefix.
Licensing
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.htmlGFDLGNU Free Documentation Licensetruetrue
to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
Attribution information, such as the author's name, e-mail, website, or signature, that was once visible in the image itself has been moved into the image metadata and/or image description page. This makes the image easier to reuse and more language-neutral, and makes the text easier to process and search for. Commons discourages placing visible author information in images.
I drew a musical instrument classification chart in GIMP, and then ported it to Inkscape, and then I got a professional graphic artist to help with making the layout look nicer, but unfortunately the graphic artist uses commercial software on a microsoft
File usage
The following pages on the English Wikipedia use this file (pages on other projects are not listed):
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction