Editorial independence is the absence of external control or influence on journalists, authors, or media organisations in general. It is tested, for instance, if a newspaper runs articles that may be unpopular with its advertising clientele or critical of its commercial owners or the state. The term is mostly used to denote media independence, and the freedom of the press.
"The media has increasingly grown to rely on automated decision-making to produce and distribute news. This trend challenges our understanding of editorial independence ..."[1]
See also[edit]
- Freedom of the press, the freedom from interference by governments
- Media independence
- Media manipulation
- Objectivity (journalism)
- Media policy
Related controversies[edit]
- Fox television and Monsanto Company[2][3][4] This story is featured at length in the documentaries The Corporation and Outfoxed.
External links[edit]
What is Editorial Independence and How Does It Impact Publishing?
References[edit]
- ^ Drunen, Max van (2021-09-13). "Editorial independence in an automated media system". Internet Policy Review. 10 (3). ISSN 2197-6775.
- ^ "Blowing the Whistle On Your Own Station". Columbia Journalism Review. March 1, 2001. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
- ^ Schweitzer, Sarah (August 19, 2000). "Reporter wins suit over firing". St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
- ^ "The media can legally lie". St. Louis Journalism Review. December 1, 2004. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction