A location test is a statistical hypothesis test that compares the location parameter of a statistical population to a given constant, or that compares the location parameters of two statistical populations to each other. Most commonly, the location parameter (or parameters) of interest are expected values, but location tests based on medians or other measures of location are also used.
One-sample location test
[edit]The one-sample location test compares the location parameter of one sample to a given constant. An example of a one-sample location test would be a comparison of the location parameter for the blood pressure distribution of a population to a given reference value. In a one-sided test, it is stated before the analysis is carried out that it is only of interest if the location parameter is either larger than, or smaller than the given constant, whereas in a two-sided test, a difference in either direction is of interest.
Two-sample location test
[edit]The two-sample location test compares the location parameters of two samples to each other. A common situation is where the two populations correspond to research subjects who have been treated with two different treatments (one of them possibly being a control or placebo). In this case, the goal is to assess whether one of the treatments typically yields a better response than the other. In a one-sided test, it is stated before the analysis is carried out that it is only of interest if a particular treatment yields the better responses, whereas in a two-sided test, it is of interest whether either of the treatments is superior to the other.
The following tables provide guidance to the selection of the proper parametric or non-parametric statistical tests for a given data set.
Parametric and nonparametric location tests
[edit]The following table summarizes some common parametric and nonparametric tests for the location parameters of one or more samples.
1 group | N ≥ 30 | One-sample t-test | ||
N < 30 | Normally distributed | One-sample t-test | ||
Not normal | Sign test | |||
2 groups | Independent | N ≥ 30 | t-test | |
N < 30 | Normally distributed | t-test | ||
Not normal | Mann–Whitney U or Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |||
Paired | N ≥ 30 | paired t-test | ||
N < 30 | Normally distributed | paired t-test | ||
Not normal | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | |||
3 or more groups | Independent | Normally distributed | 1 factor | One way anova |
≥ 2 factors | two or other anova | |||
Not normal | Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks | |||
Dependent | Normally distributed | Repeated measures anova | ||
Not normal | Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks |
1 group | np and n(1-p) ≥ 5 | Z-approximation | |
np or n(1-p) < 5 | binomial | ||
2 groups | Independent | np < 5 | fisher exact test or Barnard's test |
np ≥ 5 | chi-squared test | ||
Paired | McNemar or Kappa | ||
3 or more groups | Independent | np < 5 | collapse categories for chi-squared test |
np ≥ 5 | chi-squared test | ||
Dependent | Cochran's Q |
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction