Carryover Credits (Kyoto carryover credits) are a carbon accounting measure by which nations count historical emission reductions that exceeded previous international goals towards its current targets.[1] In essence, carryover credits represent the volume of emissions a country could have released, but did not.[2][3] When used in reference to the Paris Agreement, it refers to a scheme under which unspent "Clean Development Mechanism credits" (CDM credits) introduced by the Kyoto Protocol will be "carried over" to the new markets established by the agreement.[4][5][6] As part of the Paris Agreement, CDM credits will be replaced by an international emissions trading market, where by countries can sell their excess emissions credits to other countries.[7][8] While most countries do not count their credits, several countries led by Australia, including Brazil, India, and Ukraine are attempting to allow their credits to be carried over.[1][4] The proposal has been criticized, with scientists estimating that if countries were to make full use of their excess credits global temperatures could rise by an extra 0.1 °C.[9] In addition countries could use their excess credits to flood the market and greatly reduce the price of credits.[9]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Foley, Mike (2019-12-09). "Using Kyoto credits to meet Paris agreement 'misses the point': Garnaut". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2019-12-16.
- ^ Pears, Alan; Baxter, Tim. "Carry-over credits and carbon offsets are hot topics this election – but what do they actually mean?". The Conversation. Retrieved 2019-12-16.
- ^ "Explained: why Kyoto carryover credits are so important". Australian Financial Review. 2019-04-02. Retrieved 2019-12-20.
- ^ a b "Cop25: What was achieved and where to next?". Climate Home News. 2019-12-16. Retrieved 2019-12-16.
- ^ Slezak, Michael (2019-12-10). "Australia wants to use credits to claim most of its Paris commitment. World leaders are debating banning them". ABC News. Retrieved 2019-12-20.
- ^ Morton, Adam (2019-12-11). "Australia's use of accounting loophole to meet Paris deal found to have no legal basis". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-12-20.
- ^ "In-depth Q&A: How 'Article 6' carbon markets could 'make or break' the Paris Agreement". Carbon Brief. 2019-11-29. Retrieved 2019-12-16.
- ^ Paris Agreement (PDF) (Report). United Nation. 2019-11-01. pp. 8–9, Article 9. Retrieved 2019-12-20.
- ^ a b "The countries with the biggest hoard of Kyoto credits". Australian Financial Review. 2019-12-16. Retrieved 2019-12-16.
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction