![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cb/Legal_brushhead_in_curling.jpg/220px-Legal_brushhead_in_curling.jpg)
"Broomgate" also known as brushgate was a technology doping controversy in the sport of curling during the 2015–16 season. It was caused by the result of new brush head technologies and sweeping techniques that dramatically altered how the game was played that season. It resulted in a World Curling Federation summit to regulate and standardize brushes in the sport.
Background
[edit]In curling, sweeping the ice in front of the rock traditionally has been used to make the rock travel further and to maintain a straighter trajectory. In 2015, many of the world's top competitive teams began using new fabrics on their broom heads which were described as being "like sandpaper, but at a microscopic level". The new brush heads were criticized as being able to steer the rocks like a "joystick",[1] and were able to "slow a rock down" and to make it curl more, the opposite of what sweeping has traditionally done.[2] These new abilities were criticized as it took away the skill of the act of shooting the rock. Many top curlers believed that if a thrower shoots a bad rock, they shouldn't be rewarded.[3] There was also the worry that shots were being made "too easy", and that the result of a game could come down to just one missed shot.[4]
Early use
[edit]During the 2014–15 season, the Mike McEwen team were the first top team to employ the use of a new brush head[5] called the "icePad", which was manufactured by the fledgling Hardline Curling company.[1] The team saw tremendous success during the season, winning the 2014 Canada Cup, two Grand Slams and five other tour events, finishing the season ranked first on the World Curling Tour Order of Merit and money rankings.[6][7] Team Reid Carruthers also adopted the Hardline brush heads that season.[8]
In the off season, the Brad Gushue rink realized the effectiveness of the Hardline brush heads, and bought some themselves to try out at an event in South Korea. After struggling to figure them out, they then realized that they could be used to make the rock curl more or to "back them up off the sheet".[9] The team employed these new sweeping techniques with the brush heads, which was dubbed "directional sweeping"[10] at the 2015 GSOC Tour Challenge Grand Slam event, the first major tournament of the 2015–16 season, held in September. There the team turned heads, as they only used one sweeper to brush their rocks, instead of the traditional two. The thought process by the Gushue team was that having two sweepers would "cancel out" the directional sweeping of each other with the new brush heads.[11]
In response to Gushue's display at the Tour Challenge, Team Glenn Howard called up their broom supplier, Balance Plus and got them to develop their own brush heads to rival the IcePads.[9] Teams affiliated with Balance Plus debuted them at the 2015 Stu Sells Toronto Tankard tour event, and showed that the Balance Plus fabric dubbed "the Blackhead" or "Black Magic" was even more powerful than the Hardline fabric.[12]
The 2015 Stu Sells Toronto Tankard was a flash point in the Broomgate saga, as it featured teams using the Hardline icePad versus teams using the Balance Plus Black Magic heads. The effectiveness of the Balance Plus brooms was so strong, that it was noticeably damaging the ice. Teams got so upset that they were forced to make a "gentleman's agreement" mid-way through the event to stop using either brush head so that the conditions were fair. However, when the Balance Plus sponsored Glenn Howard rink made it to the finals against the Hardline sponsored Mike McEwen rink, Howard gave McEwen an ultimatum: either stop using the Hardline brush heads for good, or we will bring the Black Magic heads back for the final. Team McEwen refused, and so the final featured the two teams and the rival brooms in action. The game, which lasted seven ends, ended up taking three and half hours, over an hour longer than normal, as the McEwen rink had to "clean up" the ice after every Team Howard shot due to the damage the Balance Plus brush heads were doing. Ironically, it was this damage that ended up ruining one of the Howard team's shots, resulting in the team losing the game.[13]
Backlash
[edit]Following the controversy at the Stu Sells Toronto Tankard, Balance Plus recalled their brooms, asking teams to send the brush heads back. Later in the month, prior to the Canad Inns Prairie Classic, 22 of the top men's and women's teams on the World Curling Tour signed an agreement to stop using the new fabrics, and the tour itself asked curlers to stop using them.[14]
In November 2015, the World Curling Federation instituted a moratorium on new brush heads, with that year's Pacific-Asia Championships being the first event following the temporary ban. The ruling stated that "modified, custom-made or home-made (and) only sweeping equipment available for sale to the public at retail outlets will be permitted."[15]
The scandal was even mocked on a November, 2015 episode of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert which dubbed it "Broomageddon".[10]
Banning
[edit]In May 2016, a number of the world's top curlers gathered in Kemptville, Ontario to test various brush heads with the help of the National Research Council in what was dubbed as a "Sweeping Summit".[4] At the summit, the curlers and researchers tested over 50 different brush heads and sweeping techniques using robots and GPS technologies.[3]
Prior to the start of the 2016–17 season The World Curling Federation decided on allowing for only one standard fabric in sanctioned events.[10] Curling Canada followed suit, banning all other fabrics from their competitions.[16]
Podcast
[edit]Nine years later, comedian and former curler John Cullen hosted a six-part CBC podcast called Broomgate: A Curling Scandal which covered the events of broomgate in great detail. Cullen called himself "patient zero" in the scandal, as he was among the first curlers to use the new brush head fabric during the 2013–14 season, and recommended its use to Mike McEwen and his team.[17]
References
[edit]- ^ a b "Hey curlers, brush up on your knowledge of 'Broomgate'". Winnipeg Free Press. June 28, 2016. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ "Canadian curling world swept up in 'Broomgate'". Global News. November 6, 2015. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ a b "Sweeping Changes In Store For Curling After 'Broomgate'". NPR. June 5, 2016. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ a b "Curlers ready to solve broomgate: Testing this week in Kemptville helping decide which brushes will be legal in future". Ottawa Citizen. May 25, 2016. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ John Cullen (6 May 2024). "Transcript: Broomgate, Episode 2". CBC (Podcast). Retrieved 8 May 2024.
- ^ "World Curling Team Ranking: Men". April 20, 2015. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ "World Curling Tour: Men's Ranking". World Curling Tour. June 29, 2015. Archived from the original on June 9, 2020. Retrieved August 12, 2020.
- ^ Don Landry (October 15, 2015). "Curling's broom brouhaha: Manufacturer fights back". Yahoo! Sports. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ a b John Cullen (13 May 2024). "Transcript: Broomgate, Episode 3". CBC (Podcast). Retrieved 19 May 2024.
- ^ a b c "Five Years After Curling's Biggest Scandal". The Curling News. November 21, 2020. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ Kenn Oliver (September 18, 2015). "One for the money". Saltwire. Retrieved May 8, 2024.
- ^ Don Landry (October 13, 2015). "Coming to a head: Emotional debate as curlers look for a broom technology solution". Yahoo! Sports. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ John Cullen (20 May 2024). "Transcript: Broomgate, Episode 4". CBC (Podcast). Retrieved 21 May 2024.
- ^ "Sweep disorder". Winnipeg Free Press. October 18, 2015. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ "'Frankenbrooms' temporarily banned by World Curling Federation". CBC. November 16, 2015. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ "New rules for curling nix broom moves that were changing the game". CBC. September 11, 2016. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ "Hurry hard feelings: Calgary comedian gets to the bottom of 'Broomgate'". Calgary Herald. May 9, 2024. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction