Cannabaceae

A special election for one judge of the International Criminal Court was held during the resumption of the 13th session of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court which took place in The Hague from 24 to 25 June 2015.[1]

The election became necessary after one judge elected in the 2011 election was unavailable: Miriam Defensor-Santiago had resigned from the bench on 3 June 2014.[1]

Background

[edit]

The judge elected at this election was chosen to complete the term, until 10 March 2021, of the judge he replaced.

The election was governed by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Its article 36(8)(a) states that "[t]he States Parties shall, in the selection of judges, take into account the need, within the membership of the Court, for:

  • (i) The representation of the principal legal systems of the world;
  • (ii) Equitable geographical representation; and
  • (iii) A fair representation of female and male judges."

Furthermore, article 36(3)(b) and 36(5) provide for two lists:

  • List A contains those judges that "[h]ave established competence in criminal law and procedure, and the necessary relevant experience, whether as judge, prosecutor, advocate or in other similar capacity, in criminal proceedings";
  • List B contains those who "[h]ave established competence in relevant areas of international law such as international humanitarian law and the law of human rights, and extensive experience in a professional legal capacity which is of relevance to the judicial work of the Court".

Each candidate has to belong to exactly one list. A minimum of nine judges elected from list A and five judges elected from list B is to be maintained on the court.

Further rules of election were adopted by a resolution of the Assembly of States Parties in 2004.[2]

Judges remaining in office

[edit]

The following judges remained in office:[3]

Judge Nationality   List A or B   Regional criteria   Gender
List A List B African Asian E. European GRULAG WEOG Female Male
Joyce Aluoch  Kenya X X X
Chung Chang-ho  South Korea X X X
Chile Eboe-Osuji  Nigeria X X X
Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi  Argentina X X X
Robert Fremr  Czech Republic X X X
Geoffrey A. Henderson [de]  Trinidad and Tobago X X X
Olga Venecia Herrera Carbuccia  Dominican Republic X X X
Piotr Hofmański  Poland X X X
Péter Kovács  Hungary X X X
Antoine Mindua  Democratic Republic of the Congo X X X
Sanji Mmasenono Monageng  Botswana X X X
Howard Morrison  United Kingdom X X X
Kuniko Ozaki  Japan X X X
Marc Pierre Perrin de Brichambaut  France X X X
Bertram Schmitt  Germany X X X
Cuno Tarfusser  Italy X X X
Christine van den Wyngaert  Belgium X X X
       
12 5 4 2 3 3 5 6 11

Nomination process

[edit]

The nomination period of judges for the 2015 special election lasted from 18 February to 31 March 2015[1] and could have been extended up to three times if there had been a lack of candidates from a group for which a minimum voting requirement was in place. The following persons were nominated:[4]

Name Nationality List A or B Region Gender
Ibrahim Aljazy  Jordan List B Asia-Pacific States Male
Raul Cano Pangalangan  Philippines List B Asia-Pacific States Male

The nomination dated 31 March 2015 of A.B.M. Khairul Haque of Bangladesh was withdrawn on 13 April 2015.

Minimum voting requirements

[edit]

Minimum voting requirements governed part of the election. This was to ensure that articles 36(5) and 36(8)(a) cited above were fulfilled. For this election, the following minimum voting requirements existed; they could have been adjusted once the election was underway.

Regarding the List A or B requirement, there was no minimum voting requirement.

Regarding the regional criteria, there was a voting requirement for one judge from the Asia-Pacific States.

Regarding the gender criteria, there was no minimum voting requirement.

The regional criterion could have been adjusted even before the election depending on the number of candidates. Paragraph 20(b) of the ASP resolution that governs the elections states that if there are less than double the number of candidates required for each region, the minimum voting requirement shall be a (rounded-up) half of the number of candidates; except when there is only one candidate which results in no voting requirement.

The regional criterion would have been dropped if the seat had not been filled after four ballots.

The voting requirements were as follows:[1]

Criterion Number of judges required Number of judges remaining in office Voting requirement ex ante Number of candidates Adjusted voting requirement Adjusted requirement equals ex ante?
Lists A or B
List A 9 12 0 0 0 Yes
List B 5 5 0 2 0 Yes
Regional criteria
African states 3 4 0 0 0 Yes
Asian states 3 2 1 2 1 Yes
Eastern European states 3 3 0 0 0 Yes
Latin American and Caribbean States 3 3 0 0 0 Yes
Western European and other States 3 5 0 0 0 Yes
Gender criteria
Female 6 6 0 0 0 Yes
Male 6 11 0 2 0 Yes

Ballots

[edit]

On 24 June 2015, Raul Cano Pangalangan of the Philippines was elected.[5]

The ballot took place on 24 June 2015. The voting totals were as follows:

Name Nationality List A or B Region Gender 1st round 2nd round
Number of States Parties voting 83 84
Two-thirds majority 56 56
Ibrahim Aljazy  Jordan List B Asia-Pacific States Male 30 25
Raul Cano Pangalangan  Philippines List B Asia-Pacific States Male 53 59

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d "ICC-ASP/R13/SP/04" (PDF). Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute. Retrieved 23 July 2024.
  2. ^ "Resolution ICC-ASP/3/Res.6" (PDF). Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute. 10 September 2004. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 April 2024. Retrieved 22 July 2024.
  3. ^ "Annex II – Composition of the judges" (PDF). Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute. p. 11. Retrieved 22 July 2024.
  4. ^ "Nominations". Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute. 23 July 2014. Retrieved 23 July 2024.
  5. ^ Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute elects a judge. ICC press release. 24 June 2015. Retrieved 28 June 2015.

One thought on “Cannabaceae

  1. Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
    View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction

Leave a Reply