1970 Colorado gubernatorial election
County results
Love: 40-50% 50-60% 60-70%
Hogan: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70%
The 1970 Colorado gubernatorial election was held on November 3, 1970. Incumbent Republican John Arthur Love defeated Democratic nominee Mark Anthony Hogan with 52.46% of the vote. This would be the last time until 1998 that Colorado elected a Republican as Governor and also the last time Denver County , Boulder County , and San Miguel County voted for the Republican candidate.
Primary elections were held on September 8, 1970.[ 1]
Major party candidates
John Arthur Love, Republican
Mark Anthony Hogan, Democratic
Other candidates
County results[ 2] [ 3]
County
John A. Love
Republican
Mark Hogan
Democratic
Albert L. Gurule
Raza Unida
Walter R. Plankinton
American Independent
James Lauderdale
Socialist Workers
Total Votes
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
Adams
20,666
45.45%
23,475
51.63%
2,061
2.33%
279
0.39%
86
0.19%
45,467
Alamosa
1,909
54.57%
2,464
41.85%
209
3.12%
26
0.46%
0
0.00%
3,498
Arapahoe
30,329
63.19%
17,064
35.55%
433
0.90%
131
0.27%
43
0.09%
48,000
Archuleta
334
41.29%
456
56.37%
17
2.10%
2
0.25%
0
0.00%
809
Baca
1,006
54.38%
825
44.59%
3
0.16%
15
0.81%
1
0.05%
1,850
Bent
1,126
48.89%
1,124
48.81%
45
1.95%
6
0.26%
2
0.09%
2,303
Boulder
23,617
57.90%
16,299
39.96%
618
1.52%
121
0.30%
135
0.33%
40,790
Chaffee
1,583
48.50%
1,627
49.85%
41
1.26%
7
0.21%
6
0.18%
3,264
Cheyenne
643
55.24%
515
44.24%
1
0.09%
5
0.43%
0
0.00%
1,164
Clear Creek
971
55.90%
728
41.91%
26
1.50%
10
0.58%
2
0.12%
1,737
Conejos
1,242
51.05%
971
39.91%
214
8.80%
4
0.16%
2
0.08%
2,433
Costilla
457
34.46%
771
58.14%
82
6.18%
9
0.68%
7
0.53%
1,326
Crowley
657
46.90%
728
51.96%
14
1.00%
2
0.14%
0
0.00%
1,401
Custer
384
58.45%
272
41.40%
1
0.15%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
657
Delta
2,511
49.13%
2,558
50.05%
9
0.18%
29
0.57%
4
0.08%
5,111
Dolores
285
44.88%
347
54.65%
1
0.16%
2
0.31%
0
0.00%
635
Douglas
1,872
62.84%
1,072
35.99%
7
0.23%
27
0.91%
1
0.03%
2,979
Eagle
887
49.78%
864
48.48%
25
1.40%
4
0.22%
2
0.11%
1,782
El Paso
25,312
53.67%
21,254
45.07%
309
0.66%
226
0.48%
60
0.13%
47,161
Elbert
730
52.44%
654
46.98%
7
0.50%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
1,392
Fremont
3,524
45.81%
4,113
53.46%
27
0.35%
26
0.34%
3
0.04%
7,693
Garfield
2,398
48.62%
2,519
51.07%
5
0.10%
10
0.20%
0
0.00%
4,932
Gilpin
360
55.13%
281
43.03%
6
0.92%
6
0.92%
0
0.00%
653
Grand
977
64.66%
530
35.08%
1
0.07%
2
0.13%
1
0.07%
1,511
Gunnison
1,075
52.98%
938
46.23%
9
0.44%
6
0.30%
1
0.05%
2,029
Hinsdale
107
64.46%
59
35.54%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
166
Huerfano
963
33.55%
1,749
60.94%
150
5.23%
6
0.21%
2
0.07%
2,870
Jackson
398
59.23%
274
40.77%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
672
Jefferson
46,003
61.87%
27,370
36.81%
747
1.00%
195
0.26%
34
0.05%
74,349
Kiowa
572
53.16%
500
46.47%
1
0.09%
3
0.28%
0
0.00%
1,076
Kit Carson
1,463
55.95%
1,139
43.56%
9
0.34%
4
0.15%
0
0.00%
2,615
La Plata
3,558
55.20%
2,777
43.08%
69
1.07%
36
0.56%
6
0.09%
6,446
Lake
773
33.67%
1,480
64.46%
28
1.22%
11
0.48%
4
0.17%
2,296
Larimer
14,133
61.06%
8,674
37.48%
255
1.10%
50
0.22%
33
0.14%
23,145
Las Animas
2,602
38.89%
3,785
56.57%
284
4.24%
11
0.16%
9
0.13%
6,691
Lincoln
1,092
52.25%
992
47.46%
6
0.29%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,090
Logan
3,269
51.23%
3,082
48.30%
16
0.25%
8
0.13%
6
0.09%
6,381
Mesa
8,411
47.07%
9,277
51.92%
74
0.41%
76
0.43%
30
0.17%
17,868
Mineral
156
50.65%
148
48.05%
3
0.97%
1
0.32%
0
0.00%
308
Moffat
1,297
54.50%
1,072
45.04%
8
0.34%
2
0.08%
1
0.04%
2,380
Montezuma
1,944
49.97%
1,920
49.36%
10
0.26%
11
0.28%
5
0.13%
3,890
Montrose
2,652
48.48%
2,694
49.25%
60
1.10%
39
0.71%
25
0.46%
5,470
Morgan
3,403
56.57%
2,592
43.09%
11
0.18%
6
0.10%
4
0.07%
6,016
Otero
3,718
50.90%
3,460
47.36%
101
1.38%
17
0.23%
9
0.12%
7,305
Ouray
314
51.64%
290
47.70%
1
0.16%
3
0.49%
0
0.00%
608
Park
570
55.99%
438
43.03%
2
0.20%
8
0.79%
0
0.00%
1,018
Phillips
914
47.88%
990
51.86%
4
0.21%
1
0.05%
0
0.00%
1,909
Pitkin
1,378
49.84%
1,307
47.27%
53
1.92%
17
0.61%
10
0.36%
2,765
Prowers
2,379
52.85%
2,078
46.17%
35
0.78%
8
0.18%
1
0.02%
4,501
Pueblo
13,130
33.46%
24,478
62.38%
1,412
3.60%
127
0.32%
91
0.23%
39,238
Rio Blanco
871
54.88%
698
43.98%
2
0.13%
15
0.95%
1
0.06%
1,587
Rio Grande
2,091
60.50%
1,257
36.37%
98
2.84%
7
0.20%
3
0.09%
3,456
Routt
1,389
49.22%
1,425
50.50%
4
0.14%
3
0.11%
1
0.04%
2,822
Saguache
732
51.22%
643
45.00%
53
3.71%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
1,429
San Juan
172
45.03%
204
53.40%
3
0.79%
3
0.79%
0
0.00%
382
San Miguel
393
50.32%
386
49.42%
2
0.26%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
781
Sedgwick
819
54.38%
673
44.69%
13
0.86%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
1,506
Summit
479
54.81%
388
44.39%
6
0.69%
1
0.11%
0
0.00%
874
Teller
639
50.43%
621
49.01%
2
0.16%
5
0.39%
0
0.00%
1,267
Washington
1,200
53.05%
1,047
46.29%
4
0.18%
10
0.44%
1
0.04%
2,262
Weld
13,757
57.09%
9,841
40.84%
373
1.55%
74
0.31%
53
0.22%
24,098
Yuma
1,783
52.44%
1,610
47.35%
1
0.03%
6
0.18%
0
0.00%
3,400
Totals
350,690
52.46%
302,432
45.24%
12,179
1.82%
2,052
0.31%
1,143
0.17%
668,496
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction