| ||||||||||||||||||||||
All 8 California seats to the United States House of Representatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Election results by district. |
Elections in California |
---|
An election was held for California's delegation to the United States House of Representatives as part of the general election of the House of Representatives on November 4, 1902. California gained one seat as a result of the 1900 census, which Republicans won. However, of the existing districts, Democrats won three Republican-held districts.
Overview[edit]
United States House of Representatives elections in California, 1902 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Percentage | Seats | +/– | |
Republican | 152,373 | 52.36% | 5 | –2 | |
Democratic | 126,290 | 43.40% | 3 | +3 | |
Socialist | 8,500 | 2.92% | 0 | 0 | |
Prohibition | 3,860 | 1.33% | 0 | 0 | |
Totals | 291,023 | 100.00% | 8 | — |
Delegation composition[edit]
Pre-election | Seats | |
Republican-Held | 7 |
Post-election | Seats | |
Republican-Held | 5 | |
Democratic-Held | 3 |
Results[edit]
District 1[edit]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | James Gillett | 21,268 | 50.5 | |
Democratic | Anthony Caminetti | 19,696 | 46.7 | |
Socialist | M. F. Shore | 810 | 1.9 | |
Prohibition | W. O. Clark | 362 | 0.9 | |
Total votes | 42,136 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold |
District 2[edit]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Theodore A. Bell | 21,536 | 49.2 | |||
Republican | Frank Coombs (incumbent) | 21,181 | 48.3 | |||
Socialist | G. H. Rogers | 731 | 1.7 | |||
Prohibition | W. P. Fassett | 367 | 0.8 | |||
Total votes | 43,815 | 100.0 | ||||
Turnout | ||||||
Democratic gain from Republican |
District 3[edit]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Victor H. Metcalf (incumbent) | 20,532 | 66.2 | |
Democratic | Calvin B. White | 8,574 | 27.7 | |
Socialist | M. W. Wilkins | 1,556 | 5.0 | |
Prohibition | T. H. Montgomery | 338 | 1.1 | |
Total votes | 31,000 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold |
District 4[edit]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Edward J. Livernash | 16,146 | 49.2 | |||
Republican | Julius Kahn (incumbent) | 16,005 | 48.7 | |||
Socialist | William Costley | 616 | 1.9 | |||
Prohibition | Joseph Rowell | 69 | 0.2 | |||
Total votes | 16,836 | 100.0 | ||||
Turnout | ||||||
Democratic gain from Republican |
District 5[edit]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | William J. Wynn | 22,712 | 56.5 | |||
Republican | Eugene F. Loud (incumbent) | 16,577 | 41.2 | |||
Socialist | Joseph Lawrence | 620 | 1.5 | |||
Prohibition | Fred E. Caton | 301 | 0.8 | |||
Total votes | 40,210 | 100.0 | ||||
Turnout | ||||||
Democratic gain from Republican |
District 6[edit]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | James C. Needham (incumbent) | 17,268 | 53.5 | |
Democratic | Gaston M. Ashe | 13,732 | 42.5 | |
Socialist | J. L. Cobb | 815 | 2.5 | |
Prohibition | Joel H. Smith | 466 | 1.4 | |
Total votes | 32,281 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold |
District 7[edit]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | James McLachlan (incumbent) | 19,407 | 64.8 | |
Democratic | Carl A. Johnson | 8,075 | 27.0 | |
Socialist | George H. Hewes | 1,261 | 4.2 | |
Prohibition | Frederick F. Wheeler | 1,195 | 4.0 | |
Total votes | 30,638 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold |
District 8[edit]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Milton J. Daniels | 20,135 | 55.6 | ||
Democratic | William E. Smythe | 15,819 | 40.8 | ||
Socialist | Noble A. Richardson | 2,091 | 5.4 | ||
Prohibition | Ellsworth Leonardson | 762 | 2.0 | ||
Total votes | 38,807 | 100.0 | |||
Turnout | |||||
Republican win (new seat) |
See also[edit]
- 58th United States Congress
- Political party strength in California
- Political party strength in U.S. states
- United States House of Representatives elections, 1902
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction