The tsunami bomb was an attempt during World War II to develop a tectonic weapon that could create destructive tsunamis. The project commenced after US Navy officer E.A. Gibson noticed small waves generated by explosions used to clear coral reefs. The idea was developed by the United States and New Zealand military in a program code named Project Seal.[1] The weapons concept was deemed feasible, but the weapons themselves were never fully developed or used. A related concept, the bouncing bomb was developed and used in World War II, to be dropped into water as a means to destroy German dams and cause loss of industrial capacity and widespread flooding.
Testing and development
[edit]Tests were conducted by Professor Thomas Leech, of the University of Auckland, in Whangaparaoa off the coast of Auckland and off New Caledonia[1] between 1944 and 1945. British and US defence chiefs were eager to see it developed, and it was considered potentially as important as the atomic bomb. It was expected to cause massive damage to coastal cities or coastal defences.
The weapon was only tested using small explosions and never on a full scale. 3,700 test explosions[1] were conducted over a seven-month period. The tests revealed that a single explosion would not produce a tsunami, but concluded that a line of 2,000,000 kg (4,400,000 lb) of explosives about 8 km (5.0 mi) off the coast could create a destructive wave.[1]
Details of the experiments codenamed "Project Seal" were released to the public by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade in 1999 and are available at Archives New Zealand in Wellington and at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Archives in San Diego, California.[2][3]
A 1968 research report sponsored by the US Office of Naval Research addressed this hypothesis of coastal damage due to large explosion-generated waves, and found theoretical and experimental evidence showing it to be relatively inefficient in wave-making potential, with most wave energy dissipated by breaking on the continental shelf before reaching the shore.[4]
Analysis of the declassified documents in 1999 by the University of Waikato suggested the weapon would be viable.[5]
No specific targets for the weapon were identified, but in 2013 New Zealand broadcaster and author Ray Waru suggested coastal fortifications in Japan ahead of an invasion of the Japanese home islands.[6]
Egyptian magazine Al-Osboa claimed that the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami was intentionally caused by a nuclear weapon detonated in a strategic position under the ocean.[7][8]
Soviets
[edit]Andrei Sakharov in 1961 proposed a torpedo with a nuclear 100-megaton warhead, such a torpedo, could be fired at a safe distance by fitting it with a timing mechanism. Then it would explode at the right time, causing a tsunami.[9]
Russia
[edit]In 2018, Russia has released plans for a 20 to 100Mt tsunami bomb, named Status-6 or Poseidon Torpedo, which is realized as a nuclear-powered and nuclear-armed unmanned underwater vehicle with a length of about 24m. According to the plan, the Poseidon Torpedo would initiate a 500m high shockwave.
North Korea
[edit]In 2023, the KCNA reported a test of underwater attack drone 'Haeil' (해일, "tsunami" in Korean) off Hongwon Bay. Reportedly after cruising around 80-150m underwater, it creates an explosion that subsequently creates a radioactive wave.[10]
Related weapons development elsewhere
[edit]![](Https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e6/Bouncing_bomb_dam.gif/220px-Bouncing_bomb_dam.gif)
The bouncing bomb was a 5-ton bomb developed, separately, during World War II. Like the tsunami bomb, it was also designed to explode in water, and one of its intended effects was to cause massive flooding. However its targets were the massive reinforced dams of Nazi Germany, which were deemed untouchable by ordinary weapons yet, if broken, would cause extensive harm to Germany's war effort. The bombs' most unusual feature was that they were deliberately spun backwards before dropping; this backspin caused them to skip along the surface of the water for a set distance before sinking, and allowed them to evade torpedo nets that protected the dams before exploding underwater similarly to a depth charge. The inventor of the first such bomb was the British engineer Barnes Wallis, whose "Upkeep" bouncing bomb was used in the RAF's Operation Chastise of May 1943 to bounce into German dams and explode underwater, with effect similar to the underground detonation of the Grand Slam and Tallboy earthquake bombs, both of which he also invented. His April 1942 paper "Spherical Bomb — Surface Torpedo" described this method of attack.[11] The weapons were used successfully against three dams in 1943.
The earthquake bomb, or seismic bomb, was a separate but related concept that was separately invented by the British aeronautical engineer Barnes Wallis early in World War II and subsequently developed and used on land against strategic targets in Europe.[12] The earthquake bomb also used the concept of an explosion in a dense medium. It differed somewhat in concept from traditional aircraft-borne bombs, which usually explode at or near the surface, and destroy their target directly by explosive force. By contrast, an earthquake bomb is dropped from very high altitude to gain more speed, and upon impact penetrates and explodes deep underground, causing massive caverns (camouflets) or craters as well as much more severe shockwaves. In this way, they can affect targets that are too massive to be affected by other types of conventional bomb, as well as difficult targets such as bridges and viaducts. Earthquake bombs were used towards the end of World War II for massively reinforced installations (e.g., submarine pens with concrete walls several meters thick, caverns, buried tunnels), and bridges.[13]
-
The Möhne dam breached by Upkeep bombs
See also
[edit]- Halifax explosion, which triggered a tsunami in the harbor area.
- Status-6, a nuclear-powered and nuclear-armed unmanned underwater vehicle
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d "NZ, US attempted to create tsunami bomb". The New Zealand Herald. 3 January 2013.
- ^ Leech, Thomas D.J (18 December 1950). Project Seal: the generation of waves by means of explosives. Wellington, N.Z.: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. OCLC 31071831.
- ^ Bingham, Eugene (25 September 1999). "Tsunami bomb NZ's devastating war secret". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 30 December 2009.
- ^ Van Dorn, W. G.; LeMéhauté, Bernard; Hwang, Li-San (1968). Final Report : Handbook of Explosion-Generated Water Waves. Volume 1: State of the Art (PDF). Vol. 1. Pasadena: Tetra Tech Incorporated. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 30 December 2009.
- ^ Bingham, Eugene (28 September 1999). "Devastating tsunami bomb viable, say experts". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 30 December 2009.
- ^ Bourke, Emily (3 January 2013). "Military archives show NZ and US conducted secret tsunami bomb tests". Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
- ^ "Top conspiracy theories of all time". MSN. 22 October 2011. Archived from the original on 27 March 2014. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
- ^ "Asia Tsunami Caused by Nuclear Test - Report". Novinite. 6 January 2005. Retrieved 20 July 2013.
- ^ Sinelschikova, Yekaterina (31 July 2019). "The Soviets planned to wipe out the U.S. with a huge tsunami. How?". rbth.com.
- ^ "North Korea tests underwater attack drone that can generate 'radioactive tsunami'". Sky News. Retrieved 24 March 2023.
- ^ Sweetman (2002), (Part 1), pp. 107, 113.
- ^ Dildy, Doug (2012). Dambusters - Operation Chastise 1943. Osprey Publishing. p. 26. ISBN 978-1780964621.
- ^ "Dam Busters, Paul Brickman.
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction