Sir John Lewes Pedder (10 February 1784 – 24 March 1859) was an English Australian judge, politician and grazier, he was the first Chief Justice of Van Diemen's Land (now Tasmania).
Early life
[edit]Pedder was born in London, the eldest son of John Pedder, a barrister.[1] Pedder junior was educated at Charterhouse and the Middle Temple from 1818 where he was called to the bar in 1820.[1] Then he entered Trinity Hall, Cambridge, graduating LL.B. in 1822.[2]
Career
[edit]Pedder was appointed Chief Justice of Van Diemen's Land on 18 August 1823.[3] Pedder sailed in the Hibernia, arriving in Hobart with his wife Maria, a daughter of Lieutenant-Colonel Everett,[1] on 15 March 1824.[1] Also on the ship were Joseph Gellibrand, the first Attorney-General of Van Dieman's land and Saxe Bannister, the first Attorney-General of New South Wales. Trial by jury was a contentious issue in the colonies of New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land and each were immediately involved.[4] John Bigge conducted an inquiry from 1819 to 1821 into the colonies of NSW and Van Diemen's Land. Bigge's 1823 report on judicial establishments recommended against trial by a civilian jury,[5] and the House of Commons had narrowly defeated a proposal that juries be introduced for criminal trials, prior to passing the New South Wales Act 1823 which prescribed military juries for criminal trials before the Supreme Court and that convicts could be tried summarily. Nothing was said of the procedure before courts of quarter sessions. Both Gellibrand and Bannister were of the opinion that courts of quarter sessions could not try free persons without juries.[4] On 24 May 1824 Gellibrand in his inaugural address to the Supreme Court, spoke of trial by jury as being "one of the greatest boons conferred by the legislature upon this colony".[6]
The issue of trial by jury was first argued before the newly established Supreme Court of New South Wales and Chief Justice Forbes held that civilian juries were required for Court of Quarter Sessions.[7] Despite his initial address, Gellibrand subsequently vacillated in his views. In July 1825 the issue came before the Supreme Court of Van Diemen's Land, with the Second Law officer of the Crown, Solicitor-General Alfred Stephen, seeking an order requiring juries to be assembled while Gellibrand as the 1st Law Officer opposed it. Pedder, in a long and weighty judgment took a different view to Forbes, holding that the right to trial by civilian jury was taken away by section 19 of the New South Wales Act 1823.[8]
As Chief Justice, Pedder was automatically a member of the Legislative Council and the Executive Council, which necessitated a very close relationship with Governor Arthur and even led to him being referred to as belonging to the "government party". The Chief Justice should not have been put into such a position, and in 1851, when the new partly elected legislative council was formed, the Chief Justice was no longer one of the government nominee members. James Fenton, in referring to this, says that, although Pedder was "a very useful member of the old council", he was "now wisely removed from the disturbing arena of political strife".[9]
On 19 July 1854 Pedder had a paralytic seizure while on the bench, and shortly afterwards retired on a pension of £1500 a year under an act passed in the previous May. Pedder's wife died on 23 October 1855 after suffering from paralysis.[1] Pedder returned to England and died in Brighton on 24 March 1859. He was knighted in 1838. As a judge he has been called slow in decision and fearful of overstepping the written word of a statute. He was not a great lawyer, but he was upright and thorough, always careful that the accused should suffer no injustice. Fenton, who had personal knowledge of him, says that his "prudence and foresight often prevented grave injustice and dangerous blunders in the administration of affairs under the peculiar and difficult conditions of a colony half bond and half free".[3][10]
Legacy
[edit]Lake Pedder in south-west Tasmania was named after him.
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e Howell, P A (1967). "Pedder, Sir John Lewes (1793–1859)". Australian Dictionary of Biography. Vol. 2. Canberra: National Centre of Biography, Australian National University. pp. 319–120. ISBN 978-0-522-84459-7. ISSN 1833-7538. OCLC 70677943. Retrieved 4 March 2019.
- ^ "Pedder, John (PDR822J)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge.
- ^ a b Serle, Percival (1949). "Pedder, John Lewes". Dictionary of Australian Biography. Sydney: Angus & Robertson. Retrieved 3 November 2009.
- ^ a b Castles, Alex C. "The Judiciary and Political Questions: The First Australian Experience, 1824-1825" (PDF). (1975) 5(3) Adelaide Law Review 294.
- ^ Bigge 2nd Report (1923), p. 53.
- ^ "Supreme Court". Hobart Town Gazette and Van Diemen's Land Advertiser. 28 May 1824. p. 2. Retrieved 4 March 2019 – via National Library of Australia.
- ^ R v Magistrates of Sydney [1824] NSWSupC 20, [1824] NSWKR 3, Supreme Court (NSW)
- ^ R v Magistrates of Hobart Town [1825] TASSupC 8, Supreme Court (Van Diemen's Land).
- ^ Fenton (1884), p. 236.
- ^ Fenton (1884), p. 254.
- Fenton, James. "A History of Tasmania From Its Discovery in 1642 to the Present Time" (PDF). [1884] Australian Colonial Law Monographs 2.
- John Thomas, Bigge (1823). Report of the Commissioner of Inquiry on the judicial establishments of New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land.
{{cite book}}
:|work=
ignored (help)
Well, that’s interesting to know that Psilotum nudum are known as whisk ferns. Psilotum nudum is the commoner species of the two. While the P. flaccidum is a rare species and is found in the tropical islands. Both the species are usually epiphytic in habit and grow upon tree ferns. These species may also be terrestrial and grow in humus or in the crevices of the rocks.
View the detailed Guide of Psilotum nudum: Detailed Study Of Psilotum Nudum (Whisk Fern), Classification, Anatomy, Reproduction