The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:MarioRapMontage.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jeffhardyfan08 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Appears to be decorative use. The given purpose of use is that the file is used "to illustrate the differences in the song in both media", but this file does not actually contain any of the audio from the song. As such, this has an incoherent WP:NFCC#8 justification presently. I do not see a justifiable reason to use the non-free work even as a visual identifier, as this does not appear to be meaningful as a way to visually recognize the rap; it is not a music album/single cover. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 17:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Copyrighted, original derivative work, and not a standard illustrative cover or screenshot. This content belongs on a Mario fan wiki / wikia / fandom / etc. Andre🚐 00:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The image is purely decorative, its uploader was indef-blocked for disruptive editing, and its article was made into a redirect. ThomasO1989 (talk) 18:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense and transfer to Commons Whpq (talk) 11:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google Bard logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wallu2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There's currently a {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} tag on the page. The uploader initially indicated that they believe this is a Pakistani work, but they have since removed that claim. I can't find any good reason why this is ineligible to be moved to Commons—this is almost certainly a U.S. work given that it was created by Google (a corporate U.S. person) and was simultaneously published globally—so I would like to start a discussion on whether or not it is appropriate to move this file to Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Given it is a Google product I think we can safely say PD-ineligible-USonly doesn't apply and the file can be transferred to Commons. Salavat (talk) 04:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry about tagging it as Pakistani work because it was by-mistake, as far as licensing issue is concerned I thought it may not meet the threshold of originality guidelines, that's why I tend to use a PD-ineligible-USonly tag but do whatever has the most support If you believe. Wallu2 (talk) 09:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, I think it can be moved to Commons, if there are no other problems. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial view of the Estádio da Curuzu.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rafaelzis (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The source given indicates that the photograph was taken by Jorge Luís Totti/Ascom Paysandu, and I don't see any evidence of permission from the copyright holder to release this work under the claimed CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 04:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estádio Baenão (2019).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rafaelzis (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photograph previously published online without a free license prior to the photograph's upload to EnWiki. No evidence of permission from the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 11:59, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maraga massacre memorial in Nor Maragha.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by KhndzorUtogh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image is used in precisely one article, in its infobox. However, that article is not about the memorial; the article is about a historical event that occurred in 1992. That article wholly lacks sourced commentary on the work depicted in this image, so this fails WP:NFCC#8. Additionally, this image violates WP:FREER; while there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan, there is nonetheless a (thin) copyright that arises from how the photographer chose to frame this memorial but we do not have a free license from the photographer as it pertains to any copyright they may hold. Therefore, this image not only violates WP:NFCC#8 in the context of the article, but also WP:NFCC#1 more broadly, and this file should be deleted as such. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can add sources for the work depicted in the image. It should be also noted that up until recently the work depicted in the image was under Armenian domain. I think its pretty important for the image to exist, as it adds to the article significantly, and besides that article, the work won't be used extensively. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 12:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.