Starting in 2016, players for the United States women's national soccer team (USWNT) have engaged in a series of legal actions against the United States Soccer Federation (USSF). These legal actions detail the unequal treatment and compensation of the USWNT, as compared to the U.S. men's national soccer team (USMNT). The process of achieving equal pay and treatment started with a federal complaint submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 2016, with notable moments throughout 2017, 2019, 2020, and 2022. The fight for equal treatment and compensation has received widespread media attention, inspired legislative action in the U.S. Senate, and received fan support. The 2021 documentary film, LFG also details the story of the U.S. women's national soccer team and their fight for equal pay. A landmark equal pay agreement was reached in February 2022.[1]
History of pay discrepency
[edit]Both the women’s and the men’s national teams are required to play 20 exhibition matches per year, but were compensated very differently as of March 2016. If the women were to lose all 20 games, they would be paid $72,000 but the men would earn $100,000 for the same record. If the women won all 20 exhibition games, they only had the potential to earn $99,000 while the men would earn an average of $263,320 for this achievement.
World Cup bonuses are also extremely unequal. The USWNT bonuses are as follows: $20,000 for 3rd place, $32,500 for 2nd place, $75,000 for 1st place. The men’s team earns the following bonuses: $52,083 for 3rd, $260,417 for 2nd, $390,625 for 1st. The pay structure for advancement is so disparate that the women’s national team was awarded $2 million for winning the 2015 World Cup, but the men’s team earned $9 million for failing to advance past the 2014 World Cup’s round of 16.
The female athletes are paid $3,000 for each sponsor appearance, less than the $3,750 earned by men. When traveling for camp, either domestically or internationally, the USWNT is paid less ($50 to $60 per diem) in daily allowance than the USMNT ($62.50 to $75 per diem).[2][3]
As of March 2016, the USWNT earned between $3,600 and $4,950 per national team game while the men’s team earned between $6,250 and $17,625 per game. The World Cup roster bonus for women was $30,000, just 44% of what the men were awarded at $68,750.[4]
2016: Federal complaint
[edit]In March 2016, five female players (Alex Morgan, Hope Solo, Carli Lloyd, Megan Rapinoe, and Becky Sauerbrunn) filed a federal complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission[5] accusing the Federation of sustaining a payment structure that pays female players less than their male counterparts. This is in violation of Title VII and the Equal Pay Act.[6][7]
In April 2016, Carli Lloyd published an essay in the New York Times entitled "Why I'm Fighting for Equal Pay," which emphasized that the U.S. women's team generates more revenue for the U.S. Soccer Federation, but that the Federation was still unwilling to pay the women comparably to the male players.[8]
Separately, in February 2016, the U.S. Women's National Team Players Association filed a complaint in U.S. District court seeking to void an extension of its collective bargaining agreement with the United States Soccer Federation through the end of 2016. On July 3, 2016, the court ruled that the extension was valid and that the Players Association was bound by a no-strike provision in the agreement until December 31, 2016.[9][10]
2017: Restructuring the United States Women’s National Team Players Association
[edit]The restructuring of the USWNT players association was a necessary part of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) process that the players and USSF had been engaged in. It started with the firing of the legal counsel and head of the players union, Rich Nichols, on December 28, 2016, just three days before the USWNT’s CBA was set to expire.[11][12] The players wanted to be more involved, and restructured the association to address that.[13] They maintained the CBA committee, a finance committee, and created new subcommittees addressing things like alumni engagement, the National Women’s Soccer League (NWSL), member relations, commercial business, and social impact. They hired a management consultant, Becca Roux, to be the new director of the players association in February 2017.
Negotiations resumed on February 4, 2017. The national team proposed a collaborative relationship with U.S. Soccer and focused on equitable pay, suggesting a revenue-sharing model. The national team also took back exclusive control over licensing rights and agreed to commercial rights of $350,000 annually. The number of national team contracts was cut from 24 to 20 in 2017, decreasing by one each year until it stabilized at 16 in 2021. This created space for bigger bonuses and overall higher compensation, even though less money was guaranteed to players.
Friendly win bonuses increased from $1,350 to a minimum of $5,250 with potential of up to $8,500 depending on their opponent. Un-contracted roster players would now receive $3,500 per game until 2021, when it would increase to $3,750. This is a step up from the previous $0 earned for making a friendly roster, but still below the men’s team at $5,000. Contracted players do not receive match-appearance fees, and instead earn a $100,000 base salary. Equal treatment was also addressed in the new contract, which required the USSF to inspect fields on game day to ensure that they are in satisfactory, safe condition for soccer play.
The last negotiation session was held on April 3, 2017 during the national team’s training camp. The new contract was ratified on April 4, 2017.[14]
Gender discrimination lawsuit
[edit]2019
[edit]On March 8, 2019 (International Women's Day) the 28 players of the USWNT filed a gender discrimination lawsuit against the United States Soccer Federation in the United States District Court in Los Angeles.[15][16] Their class-action lawsuit asserted that the USSF violated the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA) and Title VII.[17] The 2019 lawsuit claimed that discrimination by the Federation impacted player compensation, where and how frequently they play, training, medical treatment, coaching, and travel arrangements to matches. This action brought an end to the 2016 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint, which was never resolved.[7]
On the claims of wage discrimination, the petitioners pointed out that United States men's national soccer team (USMNT) receive a $5,000 bonus for a loss in a friendly match, while women receive nothing for a loss or a draw. However, when the teams win, the men receive as much as $17,625, but women only receive $1,350. Further, in 2011, when the women placed second in their World Cup, they were awarded $1.8 million, split evenly among the 24 players on the team. The men's team made it only to the round of 16 that year, yet they were awarded $5 million. In 2014, when Germany won the Men's World Cup, the U.S. team was awarded $35 million by FIFA, while the women received 5% of that for their Cup victory in 2015.[16][18][19]
The United States Soccer Federation responded to the complaint in a statement detailing its efforts to promote women's soccer, including its support of the National Women's Soccer League.[20]
2020
[edit]Late on Thursday, February 20, 2020, both the USSF and the USWNT filed motions in a California federal court that each proposed an end to the gender discrimination trial.[21] The two proposals sought very different outcomes.
The USWNT claimed that because the USSF was clearly in violation of the Equal Pay Act and Title VII, two federal laws, they desired summary judgment. It was calculated that the women were owed $66,722,148 in back pay and damages.[22] This number was determined by evaluating the women’s match performances, schedules, and match results and then calculating what the USMNT would have earned under their contract compensation. Calculations include World Cup bonuses paid by FIFA for the Men’s World Cup.
In May 2020, U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner dismissed the unequal pay portion of the lawsuit, while allowing the claims of discriminatory work conditions to proceed.[23] Judge Klausner found that the USWNT were paid more in total and more per game than the USMNT during the contested years. The Judge also noted that the USWNT were offered a similar “pay for play” agreement but rejected that offer.[citation needed]
2021
[edit]In October 2021, Klausner approved a settlement between U.S. Soccer and the women's team on working conditions. Following that agreement, the players appealed Klausner's dismissal of their equal pay complaints.[24] Their argument was that the district court reached their dismissal by looking at total pay between the women and the men, without accounting for the women’s superior performance. The USWNT legal counsel argued in their appeal that the court held that pay is equal if a woman can obtain the same amount of money as a man only by working more and performing better, which is not the law. That is not the law. They also claimed that the court discounted the women’s direct evidence of discrimination, which is not allowed on summary judgment. [25] The USMNT players association filed an amicus curiae in support of the appeal, stating that "the men stand with the women in their fight to secure the equal pay they deserve."[26] The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission also filed an amicus curiae in support of the plaintiffs (the USWNT) and in favor of reversal. The brief stated "the EEOC has a strong enforcement interest in the proper analysis of pay discrimination claims under the EPA and Title VII" as reasoning for why the EEOC chose to offer its views to the court. The EEOC believed that the court should revise two errors in ruling. First was whether the plaintiffs could establish a prima facie case of discrimination under the EPA. Second was granting summary judgment to the defendants (the USSF) on the plaintiffs’ Title VII disparate-pay claim.[27]
2022
[edit]Oral arguments in an appeal filed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals began in early 2022.[28] The U.S. women's team's collective bargaining agreement expired at the end of December, 2021, and the U.S. Soccer Federation expressed hoped that a resolution could be reached outside the court system.[29][30]
On February 22, 2022, U.S. Women's National Team players filed an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint over inequality in pay and treatment, the U.S. Soccer Federation agreed to a landmark $24 million agreement which will see tens of millions of dollars in back pay owed to female players.[1][31] The terms of settlement also require equal pay for both male and female soccer player for friendlies, tournaments, and the World Cup.[31][32] This means that the USWNT will receive a share of the prize money from the 2022 FIFA World Cup games. They received more from the USMNT games in the group stage of the 2022 World Cup than the total they received for winning the past two FIFA Women's World Cup tournaments.[33] Federation president Cindy Parlow Crow adds, "We have a lot of work to do and continuing to rebuild the relationship with the players."[34]
2023
[edit]In June of 2022, the equal pay lawsuit was settled, though further concerns linger. FIFPRO's survey revealed that almost a third of players did not receive payment from their national teams over 18 months, with two-thirds reporting having to take unpaid leave from other jobs to play for their national teams. Even though the women's Euro 2022 final between England and Germany showcased remarkable talent, prize money at major tournaments still lags behind the men’s teams. A recent CNN Analysis showed that soccer players at the 2023 Women's World Cup earned on average just 25 cents for every dollar earned by men at their World Cup the previous year, though this marks an improvement from less than eight cents per dollar in 2019. Despite this, FIFA President Infantino dismissed the notion of equal pay in the Women's World Cup as a mere "slogan that comes up now and then." However, in June of 2023, it was announced that, for the first time, approximately $49 million of the record $110 million World Cup prize money would directly benefit individual players, with each player on the winning team receiving at least $270,000.[35][36][37]
Impact on women's sports
[edit]"The U.S. women’s national team is a production of a particular historical cultural formation; thus, it can not exist outside of the neoliberal, postfeminist, and post-racial context that created it."[38] This statement is true of many women's teams in many sports, whether in professional sports, teams that represent a country on the national stage, college athletics, or other opportunities for female sports. Because the USWNT was created in this context, it cannot be separated from its roots. Consequently, the women's national team has had a considerable impact on other women's soccer teams and other women's sports in advancing their fights for equality. When the victory for USWNT players occurred in February 2022, Megan Rapinoe believed that it was “not only a victory for the USWNT, but for all women's sports as female athletes fight for equal pay.”[39]
Canadian women's national soccer team
[edit]Other women’s teams have faced similar opposition as the USWNT, and the women’s national team is supporting these women in their fights for equal pay and treatment.[40] The Canadian women’s national soccer team had been told that Canada Soccer would be cutting funding to the women’s national soccer team program, meaning that Canada Soccer would not adequately fund the Canadian women’s national team just six months away from the 2023 Women’s World Cup. The players association released a statement criticizing Canada Soccer’s actions but stating that they could not afford personal risks associated with striking.[41] The United States Women’s National Team was eager to support the Canadian women, in whatever way they needed. They acknowledged that this may look differently than what the U.S. women needed during their fight.[42]
WNBA
[edit]The Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) in the United States decided to opt out of their collective bargaining agreement on November 1, 2018,[43][44] led by a Players’ Tribune letter from the Women’s National Basketball Players Association (WNBPA) president Nneka Ogwumike.[45] They were supported by Becca Roux (director of the USWNT players association) and the national soccer team players, with Roux closely collaborating with WNBPA executive director, Terri Jackson.[46]
United States women's national ice hockey team
[edit]The United States Women’s national hockey team also sought support from the national soccer team in the fall of 2017. One female hockey player reached out wondering if the soccer team’s players association could recommend a marketing consultant that would support unfulfilled marketing promises made by U.S.A. Hockey. The gold medal contender team did not even have its own social media accounts just months before the Pyeongchang Olympics.[47] USWNT players, including Alex Morgan and Carli Lloyd, publicly supported the hockey team’s decision to boycott the 2017 IIHF Women’s World Championship unless their demands for equal treatment among the hockey programs were met.[48][49]
Reactions and popular media
[edit]In 2019, Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia introduced a bill that proposed to cut off all federal funding to the men's 2026 FIFA World Cup until the women received equal pay.[50] In 2020, then U.S. presidential candidate Joe Biden called on the team to not "give up this fight," and demand U.S. Soccer "pay now," or "when I'm president, you can go elsewhere for World Cup funding."[51] The lawsuit from the USWNT members is similar to actions in other sports and employment fields where women are systematically paid less than their male counterparts. The attention reignited a conversation about the pay disparities of genders in the workplace.[52][53] Following the 2019 World Cup victory of the U.S. women's team, Senator Kamala Harris said, "As we celebrate the @USWNT today, it's on us to take up their charge and fight for equal pay. Let's flip the script and hold corporations accountable by requiring them to prove they're not engaging in pay discrimination — and fine companies that fail to close their pay gaps."[54]
Documentary film
[edit]The story of the U.S. women's national soccer team and their fight for equal pay was the subject of the 2021 documentary film LFG directed and produced by Andrea Nix Fine and Sean Fine.[55]
The documentary is available to stream on MAX.[56] The website, lfgthemovie.com,[57] details the topic of the documentary, including the participants (Megan Rapinoe, Jessica McDonald, Becky Sauerbrunn, Kelley O’Hara, Sam Mewis, Christen Press), filmmakers (Change, Everywoman Studios, Propagate), and partners (P&G’s Secret and Always brands, Women’s Sports Foundation, Step Up). It also provides information on how to join the movement.
References
[edit]- ^ a b Hensly-Clancy, Molly (February 22, 2022). "U.S. Soccer, USWNT members settle equal pay lawsuit for $24 million". Washington Post. Retrieved February 22, 2022.
- ^ Karen Yourish; Joe Ward; Sarah Almukhtar (March 31, 2016). "How Much Less Are Female Soccer Players Paid?". New York Times. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ Das, Andrew (March 31, 2016). "Top Female Players Accuse U.S. Soccer of Wage Discrimination". New York Times. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ "US Women's Soccer Team: It's Our 'Responsibility' 'To Push For Equal Pay' - TODAY" (video). YouTube. TODAY. March 31, 2016. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ Hope Solo; Carli Lloyd; Megan Rapinoe; Rebecca Sauerbrunn; Alex Morgan (March 29, 2016). "U.S. Women's National Soccer Team's EEOC Filing". Scribd. Retrieved November 29, 2023.
- ^ Chappell, Bill (March 31, 2016). "U.S. Women's Soccer Team Members File Federal Equal-Pay Complaint". NPR. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ a b "USWNT equal pay lawsuit: Everything you need to know about the Women's World Cup champions' legal fight". CBSSports.com. July 11, 2019. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ Lloyd, Carli (April 10, 2016). "Carli Lloyd: Why I'm Fighting for Equal Pay". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ "Judge: US women's soccer team has no right to strike". U.S. News & World Report. June 3, 2016.
- ^ Futbol, Planet. "Court rules in favor of U.S. Soccer, USWNT can't strike". Sports Illustrated. Sports Illustrated.
- ^ Das, Andrew (December 29, 2016). "U.S. Women's National Team Fires Its Union's Leader". The New York Times. Retrieved November 25, 2023.
- ^ Das, Andrew (December 28, 2016). "Here the USWNT union statement on leadership change." tweet". Twitter. Retrieved November 25, 2023.
- ^ Das, Andrew (February 3, 2017). "U.S. Women's Team Restructures Union in Effort to Revive C.B.A. Talks". New York Times. Retrieved November 25, 2023.
- ^ Murray, Caitlin (2019). The National Team: The inside Story of the Women Who Changed Soccer. Abrams Press. pp. 280–288. ISBN 9781419734496.
- ^ "PLAINTIFFS' COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE EQUAL PAY ACT AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964" (PDF). Case No. 2:19-CV-01717. March 8, 2019. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ a b Das, Andrew (March 8, 2019). "U.S. Women's Soccer Team Sues U.S. Soccer for Gender Discrimination". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ Masters, Hannah L.E. (2020). "Red Card on Wage Discrimination: US Soccer Pay Disparity Highlights Inadequacy of the Equal Pay Act". Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law. 22 (4): 896. Retrieved November 8, 2023.
- ^ Santhanam, Laura (March 31, 2016). "Data: How does the U.S. women's soccer team pay compare to the men?". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved April 24, 2017.
- ^ O'Donnell, Norah. "Team USA members on historic fight for equal pay in women's soccer". CBS News. CNN. Retrieved April 24, 2017.
- ^ "U.S. Soccer responds to USWNT's wage complaint". Sports Illustrated. March 31, 2016.
- ^ Das, Andrew (March 12, 2020). "U.S. Women's Soccer Team Sets Price for Ending Lawsuit: $67 Million". New York Times. Retrieved November 10, 2023.
- ^ Cook, Finnie B. (February 4, 2020). "EXPERT ECONOMIC DAMAGES REPORT" (PDF). Reason.com. United States District Court For The Central District Of California, Western Division; Case No. 2:19-cv-01717. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: location (link) - ^ "Judge denies immediate appeal request by U.S. women's soccer players in unequal pay case". KTLA. June 24, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2020.
- ^ "U.S. women's team appeals equal pay ruling". ESPN.com. July 23, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2022.
- ^ Case: 21-55356 (June 23, 2021). "OPENING BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS" (PDF). THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Retrieved November 29, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- ^ Case: 21-55356 (July 30, 2021). "BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL SOCCER TEAM PLAYERS ASSOCIATION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS" (PDF). THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. p. 1. Retrieved November 29, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Case No. 21-55356 (July 30, 2021). "BRIEF OF THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS AND IN FAVOR OF REVERSAL". THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Retrieved November 29, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "USWNT: Equal pay lawsuit dismissal 'flatly wrong'". ESPN.com. December 13, 2021. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ Das, Andrew (April 12, 2021). "U.S. Women's Team Clears Hurdle to Reviving Equal Pay Fight". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ "U.S. Soccer reaches settlement with World Cup women's team on work conditions — but not pay". NBC News. December 2020. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ a b Lenthang, Marlene (February 22, 2022). "U.S. Soccer and women soccer stars settle equal pay lawsuit for $24 million". NBC News. Retrieved February 22, 2022.
- ^ Bachman, Rachael (February 22, 2022). "U.S. Women's Soccer Players, U.S. Soccer Federation Reach $24 Million Equal Pay Settlement". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 22, 2022.
- ^ "USWNT to earn more money with USMNT's win over Iran than in last two Women's World Cup titles combined". CBSSports.com. December 2022. Retrieved December 16, 2022.
- ^ Carlisle (February 22, 2022). "USWNT, U.S. Soccer Federation Settle Equal Pay Lawsuit For $24 million". espn.com. Retrieved September 15, 2023.
- ^ https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/women-fifa-world-cup-gender-pay-gap-equality/
- ^ https://www.statista.com/chart/27871/soccer-football-gender-gap-prize-money/
- ^ https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/18/football/gianni-infantino-fifa-women-world-cup-2023-spt-intl/index.html#
- ^ Narcotta-Welp, Eileen Marie (August 2016). "The future of football is feminine": a critical cultural history of the U.S. women's national soccer team. University of Iowa. p. 265. Retrieved November 5, 2023.
- ^ Stump, Scott (February 22, 2022). "Megan Rapinoe on US women's soccer team's equal pay agreement: 'This is a huge win'". Today. NBC Universal. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ Das, Andrew (March 4, 2018). "In Fight for Equality, U.S. Women's Soccer Team Leads the Way". New York Times. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ CanadianSoccerPlayers. "An update from the Canadian Soccer Players Association" (11 February 2023). Twitter. Canadian Soccer Players' Association. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ Litman, Laken (February 16, 2023). "'We'll do anything possible': USWNT backs Canada in fight for pay equity". FOX Sports. © 2023 Fox Media LLC and Fox Sports Interactive Media, LLC. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ Women's National Basketball Players' Association. "'#BetOnWomen #ThePowerOfTheW' tweet" (1 November 2018). Twitter. TheWNBPA. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ WNBA (November 1, 2018). "'NBA Deputy Commissioner and Chief Operating Officer Mark Tatum...' tweet". Twitter. WNBA. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ Ogwumike, Nneka (November 1, 2018). "Bet on Women". The Players’ Tribune. © 2023 Minute Media. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ Litman, Laken (June 3, 2019). "The USWNT's Partners, Allies and Disciples in the Fight for Equality". Sports Illustrated. © 2023 ABG-SI LLC. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ Jaffe, Sarah (March 17, 2017). "Why the U.S. Women's Hockey Players Are Planning to Strike". Dissent Magazine. © Dissent Magazine 2023. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ Morgan, Alex (March 15, 2017). "'From one #USWNT to another, we are behind you' tweet". Twitter. alexmorgan13. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ Lloyd, Carli (March 16, 2017). "'We stand behind you! #BeBoldForChange' tweet". Twitter. carlilloyd. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
- ^ "Joe Manchin: No Federal Money For 2026 World Cup Until Women's Team Gets Equal Pay". HuffPost. July 9, 2019. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ Cranley, Ellen. "'Pay now': Biden demands US Soccer give its women's national team equal pay or 'go elsewhere for World Cup funding' if he's elected president". Business Insider.
- ^ Moritz-Rabson, Daniel (July 10, 2019). "It isn't just soccer: U.S. women still only earn $0.79 for every $1 received by men". Newsweek. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ Manno, Carolyn (September 6, 2021). "How female athletes are pushing for a level playing field". CNN. Retrieved December 16, 2022.
- ^ Harris, Kamala (July 10, 2019). ""As we celebrate the @USWNT today.." tweet". Twitter. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ Chang, Ailsa; Contreras, Gus; Handel, Sarah (June 29, 2021). "The U.S. Women's Soccer Team Struggle For Equal Pay Featured In New 'LFG' Documentary". NPR. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ "Watch LFG". MAX. ©2023 WarnerMedia Direct, LLC. 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2023.
- ^ "LFG The Movie". Retrieved November 8, 2023.