Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.


Templates and Modules[edit]

Template:12TeamBracket-reseed[edit]

And also:

Redundant to {{12TeamBracket}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 20:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deleteslow[edit]

Deletion tag template for a deletion process that does not exist - there is no process that results in pages being deleted after 3 days "unless they are revised" on the English Wikipedia. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This user is cremating template for processes that do not exist and is creating work for other editors cleaning up after them. If this continues they should really get blocked from creating new templates. Gonnym (talk) 18:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Double strikethrough/backend[edit]

Propose merging Template:Double strikethrough/backend with Module:Dssplit.
Template:Double strikethrough/backend is only used by the module. In general, if there already is a module, then the entire code should be there and not split between module and templates. Gonnym (talk) 06:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both without merging as part of a walled garden of unused templates created by the same person who does not appear to be here to build an encyclopedia. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move Template:Double strikethrough/backend to Template:Double strikethrough, Delete the module. The current setup of a template invoking a module which expands a sub-template is daft and unnecessarily complex - just use the template directly. I don't think the "added functionality" in the module of redacting url's is a good idea - a double strikethrough template should just strike through the text, it shouldn't have extra functionality as it is more likely to confuse than help. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Starship flights/suborbital[edit]

Unused table. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PopulationData.net[edit]

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 06:34, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Antigonadotropic effects of estradiol[edit]

Unused medication related graphs. Gonnym (talk) 06:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Absolute activities of tibolone and metabolites[edit]

Unused medication related tables. Gonnym (talk) 06:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Letters with bar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy keep per WP:SK#1, no rationale for deletion. (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 16:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion was delete after replacement as discussed. Гулпият Мадина Омарова (talk) 05:42, 4 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment Looks like these need procedural and tech check. -DePiep (talk) 05:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "as discussed" not found. -DePiep (talk) 07:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This whole thing looks a deliberately disruptive spoof. There has been no discussion and therefore no result and no deletion. WP:DISRUPTIVE. Close as nonsense. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 09:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).