Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

How this document has been cited

—it was held that a provision of the Wyoming Constitution declaring that the governor should not be eligible to any other office during the term for which he was elected could not prevent the governor from becoming a member of the United States House of Representatives or the United States Senate because the qualifications for those offices are established by the United …
- in Benesch v. Miller, 1968 and 7 similar citations
To the contrary, an impressive number of courts have determined that States lack the authority to add qualifications.
- in US Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 1995 and 6 similar citations
Whenever States have attempted to require qualifications for the office of United States Senator other than those named in the third clause of § 3 of Article 1 of the Constitution of the United States, they have been uniformly rejected by the State courts.
—holding that it is unconstitutional qualification for state to require its governor to resign in order to run for Congress
Instead, we continue to believe that " `[i] f no person can be elected to that office who does not possess these qualifications, it follows by a familiar rule of interpretation that any person who does possess them may be elected.'"
- in Cathcart v. Meyer, 2004 and 4 similar citations
—state constitution cannot bar Governor and Lieutenant Governor from becoming members of Congress during term
For court cases relying on Justice Story's view that states do not have the power to add to the Qualifications Clauses
- in Detroit College of Law at Michigan State University Law Review and 3 similar citations
—the Wyoming Supreme Court undertook a detailed historical analysis and concluded that the Qualifications Clauses were exclusive.
- in US Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 1995 and 3 similar citations
The First Circuit, however, has addressed this issue, and concluded that "the test to determine whether or not the `restriction'amounts to a `qualification'within the meaning of Article I, Section 3, is whether the candidate `could be elected if his name were written in by a sufficient number of electors.'"
- in Public Citizen, Inc. v. Miller, 1993 and 2 similar citations

Cited by

514 US 779 - Supreme Court 1995
446 P. 2d 400 - Alaska: Supreme Court 1968
191 F. 3d 911 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit 1999
872 SW 2d 349 - Ark: Supreme Court 1994
813 F. Supp. 821 - Dist. Court, ND Georgia 1993
746 F. 2d 97 - Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit 1984
706 F. 2d 1523 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1983
550 F. Supp. 605 - Dist. Court, ED New York 1982
610 P. 2d 776 - Okla: Supreme Court 1980
521 P. 2d 568 - Nev: Supreme Court 1974