How this document has been cited
In this connection the Iowa Supreme Court said, "It [is] not essential that the peril to life should be imminent. It [is] enough that it be potentially present, even though its full development might be delayed to a greater or less extent. Nor [is] it essential that the doctor should believe that the death of the patient would be otherwise certain in order to justify him in affording …
- in Gleitman v. Cosgrove, 1967 and 14 similar citations
Two other jurisdictions have also rejected an interpretation of "necessary to preserve" which would require certainty or immediacy of death
- in People v. Belous, 1969 and 7 similar citations
The authorities are to the effect that when it is shown that the woman was healthy and in a normal condition... the evidence is sufficient to raise the inference and to find the fact that the production of the miscarriage was not necessary to save the woman's life....
- in To Be or Not to Be: The Constitutional Question of the California Abortion Law and 2 similar citations
—it was held that a dead fetus was presumptively a danger to the mother's life; therefore, the defendant was acquitted under the therapeutic exception.
- in Southern California Law Review and 2 similar citations
Immediacy of death is relevant to the endangerment of life-in spite of the contrary opinion of some courts.
- in The ethics in the situation and one similar citation
Cited by
167 Cal. App. 2d 803 - Cal: Court of Appeal 1959
179 NW 2d 347 - Iowa: Supreme Court 1970
458 P. 2d 194 - Cal: Supreme Court 1969
289 P. 2d 1075 - Or: Supreme Court 1955
MF McKernan Jr - The Catholic Lawyer, 2017
GJ Roden - Human Life Review, 2012
NEWYS SALUTATION -
[PDF] the HUMAN LIFE
J PRITCHETT… - 2012