Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

How this document has been cited

In this connection the Iowa Supreme Court said, "It [is] not essential that the peril to life should be imminent. It [is] enough that it be potentially present, even though its full development might be delayed to a greater or less extent. Nor [is] it essential that the doctor should believe that the death of the patient would be otherwise certain in order to justify him in affording …
- in Gleitman v. Cosgrove, 1967 and 14 similar citations
Two other jurisdictions have also rejected an interpretation of "necessary to preserve" which would require certainty or immediacy of death
- in People v. Belous, 1969 and 7 similar citations
The authorities are to the effect that when it is shown that the woman was healthy and in a normal condition... the evidence is sufficient to raise the inference and to find the fact that the production of the miscarriage was not necessary to save the woman's life....
—it was held that a dead fetus was presumptively a danger to the mother's life; therefore, the defendant was acquitted under the therapeutic exception.
- in Southern California Law Review and 2 similar citations
Immediacy of death is relevant to the endangerment of life-in spite of the contrary opinion of some courts.
- in The ethics in the situation and one similar citation

Cited by

167 Cal. App. 2d 803 - Cal: Court of Appeal 1959
179 NW 2d 347 - Iowa: Supreme Court 1970
458 P. 2d 194 - Cal: Supreme Court 1969
289 P. 2d 1075 - Or: Supreme Court 1955
MF McKernan Jr - The Catholic Lawyer, 2017
GJ Roden - Human Life Review, 2012
J PRITCHETT… - 2012