How this document has been cited
In the courts of many other States, statutes imposing a penalty for peddling, without a license, all goods of particular kinds, and not discriminating against goods brought from other States, or from foreign countries, have been held not to be repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.
- in Emert v. Missouri, 1895 and 7 similar citations
Missouri. 5 55 Thus far we have been concerned with Marshall's use of the commerce clause as an instrument of ne-52
- in The Commerce Clause Under Marshall, Taney, and Waite and one similar citation
"A person who carries jewelry from county to county for sale, is liable to the tax of twenty dollars imposed upon peddlers."—
- in The North Carolina Justice: Containing a Summary Statement of the Statutes … and one similar citation
The clause which prohibits the State from imposing a tax or duty on imports has been held to extend not only to the act of importation, but to the article imported, while it is kept for sale in bulk or package, but the restriction is removed the moment the article is withdrawn from the market as a subject of commerce and diverted to the importer's pri. vate use, or is offered for …
—above referred to, thus expresses itself: "It would seem to follow that a tax may constitutionally be imposed on such goods thus appropriated to private use, or. offered for sale in a peculiar manner, although they be taxed by the name of goods imported, or goods not of the produc-JANUARY TERM, 1867. 117
Cited by
156 US 296 - Supreme Court 1895
F Frankfurter - 2018
EC Surrency - (No Title), 1955
JCB Davis… - 1901
E McClain - 1900
EP Prentice… - 1898
JCB Davis… - 1884
![Discusses cited case Discusses cited case](https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/images/1x/lod2.png)
Dist. Court, D. Vermont 1882
WS Gibbons - 1879
SF Phillips - 1868