Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

How this document has been cited

As the Supreme Court has explained, when "the public and individuals*** proceed as if in fact there had been a dedication and acquire rights which would be lost if the owner were allowed to reclaim the land, then the law would not permit him to assert that there was no intent to dedicate no matter what may have been his secret intent."

- in Mid-Valley Resources v. Foxglove Properties, 2016 and 2 similar citations

For what is "permissive user," see note 40 supra. 92 3 DILLON, loc. cit. supra note 84. 93 "The permission by the owner of spasmodic or occasional use by the traveling public of uninclosed private real property is not sufficient to indicate an intent to dedicate the property to public use."

- in Oregon Law Review and one similar citation

"0 the plat, as filed, showed that certain premises were reserved as private property. The court held that there was no express dedication of these lands by virtue of the map. 71 In Steel

- in The Law of Dedication in Oregon

Intent “The intent of the dedicator is the foundation and life of all dedications and the intent must be clearly manifested.” 59 The intention of the owner as evidenced by his acts and the acts which he permits and encourages is controlling on the issue of dedication.

- in 1CHAPTER

City105 there were definite highways for public use, but for a time the travel spread out over private uninclosed property, part of which was owned and used by a mill for private purposes.

- in Oregon Law Review