With respect to computers, particularity as to "the things to be seized" does not require that the warrant identify the actual names of the targeted files.

However, the Court's research has revealed that only two other opinions has been issued concerning his expert testimony, both of which are unpublished.

—the defendant did not "explicitly" raise the issue of the error in the affidavit and did not argue that the false statement was made intentionally or recklessly.

Defendant Dwight Coye ("Coye") seeks reconsideration of the Court's November 14, 2002 Memorandum and Order ("M & O") denying his motion to suppress evidence seized and statements he made during a March 6, 2002 raid on his home.