Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

How this document has been cited

Corporate agents generally are deemed incapable of conspiring with one another under § 1 of the Sherman Act,

- in Corporate criminal liability: A treatise on the criminal liability of … and 2 similar citations

This Court has long held that it is within the discretion of the District Court to allow or refuse the award of attorney fees, and that we will interfere only where that discretion has been abused.

- in Brubaker v. Board of Ed., School Dist. 149, Cook Cty., Ill., 1974 and 2 similar citations

As to paragraph A of Section VI, many authorities have in effect held that the fact that some of the customers served by a defendant are from another state is not sufficient to grant jurisdiction on the basis of being within the flow of interstate commerce.

- in Race Relations Law Reporter and one similar citation

Most courts that have adopted the rule of no plurality merely restate the rule and then cite Nelson Radio. Id.

- in Intracorporate Plurality in Criminal Conspiracy Law and one similar citation

However, the award of costs in a civil litigation is within the sound discretion of the trial court.

- in Solo Cup Company v. Paper Machinery Corporation, 1966

It later stated, "In the absence of any allegation whatever to indicate that the agents of the corporation were acting in other than their normal capacities, plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action based on conspiracy under Section 1 of the Act."

- in Antitrust Considerations in the Organization and Operation of American …

Within the range of items of cost recognized by law, trial courts have broad discretion, especially where factual evaluations are involved.

- in Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., 1974

—because individual defendants acted only on behalf of corporate defendant and not on their own behalf, there was no conspiracy as required under § 1 of Sherman Act

- in Intracorporate Plurality in Criminal Conspiracy Law