Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

How this document has been cited

Among the kinds of prejudice that may obtain from joinder of offenses are "1) the jury may cumulate evidence of the separate crimes; 2) the jury may improperly infer a criminal disposition and treat the inference as evidence of guilt; 3) the defendant may become `embarrassed or confounded'in presenting different defenses to the different charges. "
- in US v. Dileo, 1994 and 14 similar citations
—"where a principal cause of postponement is the deliberate pace of the system of safeguards designed to protect the accused, the courts have been exceedingly reluctant to find constitutional infirmity even in very long delays."
- in United States v. Dunn, 1972 and 6 similar citations
One danger is that "the jury may use the evidence of one of the crimes charged to infer a criminal disposition on the part of the defendant from which is found his guilt of the other crime or crimes charged
- in Robinson v. United States, 1972 and 3 similar citations
It is quite apparent that appellant and his co-defendant by that time had exhausted "the system of safeguards designed to protect the accused."
- in United States v. Hopkins, 1972 and 2 similar citations
—concurrent sentences cured any prejudice against defendant who testified on only certain counts of a multi-count indictment
In reviewing two cases where there were multiple charges against a defendant for acts arising out of a single transaction, the District of Columbia Circuit was faced with a derivative issue, merger of offenses. 54 44s The joinder in this instance appears to be pregnant with the prejudice envisaged by rule 14 since the evidence of burglary was circumstantial, whereas …
While misjoinder is error as a matter of law, "a refusal to grant severance is error only if it is an abuse of discretion."
- in Samuels v. United States, 1978 and one similar citation
Our "predominant consideration" when deciding whether offenses are properly joined is whether the joinder "would serve the goals of trial economy and convenience
- in FADERO v. US, 2013 and 2 similar citations
The time spent in the dispute over the procedures to be used during appellant's mental examination at St. Elizabeths, and the delay caused by the two mental examinations, approximately five months, "are not normally taken into account for purposes of determining the question of a denial of speedy trial" since " `a principal cause of postponement [was] the deliberate …
- in Shreeves v. United States, 1978 and one similar citation

Cited by

433 F. 2d 1113 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit 1969
462 F. Supp. 608 - Dist. Court, D. Guam 1978
459 F. 2d 1115 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit 1972
610 F. Supp. 3d 29 - Dist. Court, Dist. of Columbia 2022
Dist. Court, Dist. of Columbia 2021
88 A. 3d 1101 - RI: Supreme Court 2014
RI: Supreme Court 2014
631 A. 2d 374 - DC: Court of Appeals 1993
564 A. 2d 726 - DC: Court of Appeals 1989
485 US 58 - Supreme Court 1988