Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

How this document has been cited

The client cannot be compelled to answer the question `What did you say or write to the attorney?'but may not refuse to disclose any relevant fact within [her] knowledge merely because [s] he incorporated a statement of such fact into [her] communication to [her] attorney
- in Pressley v. City of New York, 2013 and 207 similar citations
"The privilege only protects disclosure of communications; it does not protect disclosure of the underlying facts by those who communicated with the attorney."
- in Jacobs v. EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, 2020 and 19 similar citations
T] he protection of the privilege extends only to communications and not to facts. A fact is one thing and a communication concerning that fact is an entirely different thing
Because the Reynolds privilege, like any other evidentiary privilege, " `extends only to [evidence] and not to facts,'"
- in Mohamed v. JEPPESEN DATAPLAN, INC., 2009 and 11 similar citations
Since the attorney-client privilege protects communication between the client and the attorney, and not the underlying facts
—stating, "A corporation acquires knowledge through its officers and agents `and is charged with knowledge of all material facts of which they acquire knowledge while acting in the course of their employment and within the scope of their authority, even though they do not in fact communicate it
- in Gresik v. PA PARTNERS, LP, 2009 and 8 similar citations

Cited by

278 F. Supp. 886 - Dist. Court, ED Pennsylvania 1968
334 So. 3d 637 - Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 4th Dist. 2022
Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 4th Dist. 2022
Dist. Court, ND California 2017
60 NE 3d 39 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 9th Appellate Dist. 2016
Dist. Court, SD Ohio 2014
Dist. Court, D. Kansas 2006