—a consolidated proceeding involving both an unfair labor practice order and a direction of election.

This is the usual form of order, and has frequently been employed in cases where this Court has sustained Board orders

Matter of S. Blechman & Sons, Inc. and United Wholesale Employees of New York, Local 65, Textile Workers Organizing Committee-Committee for Industrial Organization.

The Board often described how employers "feared that [the] disclosure [of their manipulation of the company union] would have a disastrous effect on their organizational activities

A question concerning representation has arisen where two labor organizations have advanced conflicting claims and a dispute existed concerning the appropriate unit or units and the representation of employees within such unit or units.

Where one of two unions has been dominated by the employer, a similar practice is followed in postponing the election for or against the independent union until such time as the effects of the unfair labor practices are removed.

—coercion must be shown by looking beyond the speech itself to its surrounding circumstances. s In brief, this was the state of the law prior to the enactment of section 8 (c) of the Taft-Hartley Act, the "employer free speech" section, in which Congress declared that: "" The expressing of any views, argument, or opinion, or the dissemination thereof, whether in written, printed …

If the company attorney took part in the formation of any committee or back to work movement, his present or prior connection with the company will be considered.

—is a general condemnation of company unions, but characteristically says nothing about the precise issue at hand.

By acting through his own attorney, or through "recommended" company union attorneys, the employer has accomplished the same end.

[CITATION] National v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

[HTML] Annual Report of the National Labor Relations Board for the Fiscal Year Ended...

[BOOK] Annual report

[CITATION] Clerical and Office Unionism in the United States: The Unit for Collective …

[CITATION] University of Florida law review