Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas

217 US 114, 30 S. Ct. 496, 54 L. Ed. 688 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
This action was brought by the State of Texas in one of its own courts against the Southwestern
Oil Company, a corporation of that State, to recover the amount of certain taxes alleged to be …

Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Nebraska

217 US 196, 30 S. Ct. 461, 54 L. Ed. 727 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
These are two suits arising under a Nebraska statute. The first is brought by the State to recover
a fine of five hundred dollars imposed by the law for failure to obey its command; the second …

Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. Tennessee

217 US 413, 30 S. Ct. 543, 54 L. Ed. 817 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
The plaintiff in error is a Kentucky corporation and seeks to reverse a decree of the Supreme
Court of Tennessee forbidding it to do business, other than interstate commerce, in the latter …

Souffront v. Compagnie des Sucreries de Porto Rico

217 US 475, 30 S. Ct. 608, 54 L. Ed. 846 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
"Fourth. The plaintiffs admit that the judgments mentioned in the answer as a third defense to
the complaint have been rendered but the suits in which said judgments were rendered have …

Heike v. United States

217 US 423, 30 S. Ct. 539, 54 L. Ed. 821 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
The plaintiff in error, Charles R. Heike, was indicted with others on January 10, 1910, for alleged
violations of the customs laws of the United States in connection with the fraudulent importation …

Williams v. Arkansas

217 US 79, 30 S. Ct. 493, 54 L. Ed. 673 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
"SEC. 2. That it shall be unlawful for any railroad or common carrier operating a line within the
State of Arkansas knowingly to permit its trains, cars or depots within the State to be used by …

Davis v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. LR Co.

217 US 157, 30 S. Ct. 463, 54 L. Ed. 708 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
Plaintiff in error, as executor of the estate of Frank E. Jandt, brought an action against the
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company for causing the death of Jandt …

Maryland v. West Virginia

217 US 1, 30 S. Ct. 268, 54 L. Ed. 645 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
"The territories contained within the charters erecting the colonies of Maryland,
Pennsylvania, North and South Carolina, are hereby ceded, released and forever confirmed …

Javierre v. Central Altagracia

217 US 502, 54 L. Ed. 859, 30 S. Ct. 598 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
This is an appeal from a decree enjoining the appellants from delivering sugar cane grown on
the haciendas Florentina and Estero to the Central Eureka for the term of five crops, beginning …

Kidd, Dater & Price Co. v. Musselman Grocer Co.

217 US 461, 30 S. Ct. 606, 54 L. Ed. 839 - Supreme Court, 1910 - Google Scholar
470 The controversy thus arose: Early in the year 1906 Frank B. Ford operated a store in the
village of Berrien Springs, Michigan, consisting of various departments — hardware …