The questions thus presented are two: First, whether the allegations of the bill disclose the case
of a controversy between 219 the State of Missouri and the State of Illinois and a citizen …

"Provided, That whenever any foreign country or territory, or any part thereof, is occupied by or
under the control of the United States, any person who shall violate, or who has violated, the …

The plaintiff in error was indicted at August term, 1898, of the Superior Court in the county of
Suffolk and State of Massachusetts, on the statute of Massachusetts, of 1887, chapter 435, section …

To sustain a claim under this section, it is incumbent upon the claimant to prove that the Indians
taking or destroying the property belonged to a band, tribe or nation in amity with the United …

The original judgment in the Superior Court of California, which was affirmed by the Supreme
Court of that State, determined the rights of the defendant in error, and conclusively adjudged …

The law remained in this condition until the Court of Appeals act of March, 1891, was
passed, the fifth section of which permits an appeal directly from the District Court to this court …

The proponents in rebuttal called as a witness P. Tecumseh Sherman, who had already been
sworn in relation to the handwriting of his mother, and by him they offered to prove that this failure …

The only ground which the allegation of fraud in relation to the judgments is based consists in
the averment in the bill that the defendants came into court and represented that they were poor …

Motion was made to dismiss this writ of error upon the grounds: First, that the Federal question
was not raised until after the decision of the Supreme Court on June 20, 1898. Second, that the …

The present action was brought in one of the courts of Minnesota, in the name of the State, against
the WW Cargill Company, a Wisconsin corporation. The relief sought was a decree 454 perpetually …