Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

User:El Machete Guerrero[edit]

El Machete Guerrero (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

El Machete Guerrero

El Machete Guerrero (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date March 17 2009, 08:55 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Georgewilliamherbert (talk)



Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users

Good hand / bad hand behavior on Reggaeton article - just blew up on ANI, an IP editor was repeatedly making changes which seem to be improvement attempts, the listed parties above were reverting them back out and returning to a preferred version. Up to mutual 18RR. Not sure who's factually right - however, those reverting them out / returning to preferred version show a good hand bad hand pattern going back a few months. "El Perso - The Original" got out of it after a warning for edit warring, followed by "El Machete Guerrero" getting involved.

Both (and the IP) are clearly focused on the same topic area, but the extended tag team approach is concerning. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]



Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
  1. El Machete Guerrero (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  2. Kartel King (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  3. Xcahv8 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  4. Sabre Savage (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  5. Polystyla (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

These appear to be multiple accounts being used to avoid scrutiny. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked all confirmed as socks and linking to this case. Can someone please archive and tag them? Thanks. —— nixeagleemail me 00:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged.— Dædαlus Contribs 00:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date March 27 2009, 21:19 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

This account returns just after the descision has been made to ban the confirmed sock master, to harass users who have been apart of the case, such as myself and a user the sock master was edit warring with.

Evidence submitted by — Dædαlus Contribs



Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by — Dædαlus Contribs 21:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]


CU is required as the sock master was recently banned for sockpuppeting and disruption, and was told to stay way from wikipedia for at least six months before requesting an appeal. This CU will make sure that this user, who had been found to be socking before, is indeed the user that was just banned.

Please also note, as stated, the primary account has been banned per a thread on ANI, or more specifically, this diff. I realize that this account has now been blocked for attempting to harass others, but I do believe it needs to be confirmed that either this account is a sock of EMG or not as EMG was told to stay away from WP for at least six months before requesting an appeal, but if he is going to sock to evade his block, then further discussion needs to take place.— Dædαlus Contribs 21:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
  •  Clerk endorsed, valid reason I would say. Also to root out any sleepers. Foxy Loxy Pounce! 04:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Conclusions

Currently available technical evidence indicates that User:The Big Glove is Red X Unrelated to User:El Machete Guerrero. -- Avi (talk) 19:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
Mayalld (talk) 20:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/El_Machete_Guerrero/Archive