Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

May 11[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 11, 2024.

Vetter Stone Amphitheater[edit]

No mention of this certain amphitheater. Probably not really notable enough to mention especially in an article as extensive as this one. Okmrman (talk) 22:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis & Clark Caverns State Park Amphitheater[edit]

No mention of this certain amphitheater. Okmrman (talk) 22:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Country Concert 19[edit]

An event that just so happens to take place in Ohio with no mention in the actual article. Okmrman (talk) 22:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete There is a mention of "Country Concert" at Fort Loramie, Ohio, but this specific event is not. I don't see it as a particularly plausible search term either. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aroostook Trail[edit]

The Maine article does have Aroostook in it but it doesn't talk about any specific trail. Okmrman (talk) 22:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete with no prejudice on article creation if said trail is considered notable in the future. --Lenticel (talk) 00:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Morning Eagle Lake[edit]

No mention Okmrman (talk) 22:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tbennert (talk) 22:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hamler Country Fest[edit]

No mention Okmrman (talk) 22:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hambler Country Fest[edit]

No mention Okmrman (talk) 22:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great River Folk Festival[edit]

No mention Okmrman (talk) 22:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Country Concert 18[edit]

No mention. Made by a user with a history of creating redirects for non-notable events. Okmrman (talk) 22:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:TPT[edit]

Draft-to-mainspace redirect with no clear reason to exist. This isn't a leftover of any page-moving history, but was just created a couple of days ago as a redirect right from the jump, whereas we already have a disambiguation page at the mainspace title TPT. My best guess is that this was created in an attempt to render the game into the primary topic by bypassing the dab page — but even if the creator (an anonymous IP) actually wants to assert that the video game should be primary topic for TPT, using draftspace this way isn't the process for doing that. Bearcat (talk) 20:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trampampoline[edit]

WP:FANCRUFT I assume it originates from the Simpsons Okmrman (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unnotable meme not mentioned anywhere in article space. Not a helpful or useful search term. Air on White (talk) 06:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cedar Ridge Middle School[edit]

Delete for no mention at the target, and therefore confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a former article that was WP:BLARed in 2014 per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. The mention in the target article was removed in 2019 and it's no longer listed on the school district's website, because it was renamed. A mention could be added back to the target article, and the school is mentioned at Austin High School (Alabama). A different school of the same name is mentioned Oregon Trail School District, but I don't know if that's enough to justify disambiguation. - Eureka Lott 19:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The school is listed at the target article in the listing of middle schools. That's enough for the redirect. 4.37.252.50 (talk) 01:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RXJ2129-z8HeII[edit]

Does not seem to be mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@1234qwer1234qwer4: (and others) - As OA of the original Redirect, please note => the "RXJ2129-z8HeII" Redirect to "Population III stars" was based on an astronomical study published in the responsible scientific literature[1] - hope this helps in some way - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 00:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Wang, Xin; et al. (8 December 2022). "A strong He II λ1640 emitter with extremely blue UV spectral slope at z=8.16: presence of Pop III stars?". arxiv. Archived from the original on 11 May 2024. Retrieved 11 May 2024.
  • Delete since the only source on this is an arXiv preprint, and that's cited only by a couple of articles by a guy in the Prespacetime Journal. We'd need a good secondary source or two to comment on this observation before mentioning it as a possible Pop III sighting. Dicklyon (talk) 16:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Population 0[edit]

Does not appear at the target. Only mention I could find is on Wiktionary at wikt:frozen star. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • comment would this be a plausible synonym for Population Zero? --Lenticel (talk) 02:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm quite skeptical one that stuff since it does make some sense but barely anyone really does it. Okmrman (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "0" and "Zero" could be searched either way. Unless someone actually sees the logo of them they are unlikely to know which uses which term and even still they may assume we always use numbers or letters. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Appears to be a speculative term for a future star population, but couldn't find any published research on it. "Population 0" was mentioned once as a synonym for Population III stars, but this could stem from a misreading of this paper calling them "Zero-population stars". Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate there is also Aftermath: Population Zero so maybe Population Zero should be a DAB. I used to use "Population Zero" to get to Aftermath: Population Zero and suddenly found a different article there. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak disambiguate per Crouch's findings (and also maybe this is gallows humor but the first thing I thought of was Extinction or especially Human extinction, so that should be added as well). Duckmather (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes Extinction and Human extinction should be included on the DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate - There are enough potential targets that a DAB would be worthwhile. I don't find this an implausible search string either. Fieari (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperstar[edit]

Not mentioned at target. For the former, note that Iran Hyper Star also appears to be written without a space on the logo. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom for now. Seems to be a camera accessory and also a name for a series of hypermarkets according to GSearch. --Lenticel (talk) 01:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Only mention in published research as a type of star is this, which is not even about metallicity but about a pathway for black hole formation. And the article it cites doesn't actually use this term. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:GREENGABLES[edit]

Same reason as Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_May_1#Wikipedia:LITTLEORPHAN; this was created at the same time as that redirect. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:94B3:D441:1507:1AE8 (talk) 15:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: the basis for that nomination seems to have been that the redirect target was confusing(?). What alternate target do you think exists for 'green gables'? jp×g🗯️ 18:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I don't see how Green Gables relates to AN. Waylon (was) (here) 17:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Waylon111: The inside joke is based on the novel Anne of Green Gables. Lenticel (talk) 00:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a confusing inside joke at best. --Lenticel (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as harmless and no better target, also WP:FUNPOLICE. This isn't a mainspace redirect, there's no need to be so serious. Fieari (talk) 05:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Fieari. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intel core zero[edit]

I don't see how this is related to Intel Core i3. — AP 499D25 (talk) 12:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Close and Delete per AP's reason. Waylon (was) (here) 17:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intel core 0[edit]

No such thing as "Intel Core 0". I can't see anything about Intel Core i3 being related to this. — AP 499D25 (talk) 12:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Close and Delete per AP's reason. Waylon (was) (here) 17:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intel Core 4[edit]

There is no such thing as "Intel Core 4". I fail to see how Intel Core i5 is related to this. — AP 499D25 (talk) 12:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Close and Delete per AP's reason. Waylon (was) (here) 17:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Transcluded section2[edit]

0 transclusions. Unused. Magioladitis (talk) 09:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:End U.S. judge succession 2[edit]

Totally unused and insignificant edit history. Magioladitis (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wide image-2[edit]

Unused. Never really used. Magioladitis (talk) 08:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wiki category 2[edit]

No edit history. Just an incomplete template move. Unused. Magioladitis (talk) 08:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox software2[edit]

This has completely been migrated to {{Infobox software}} and has been unused for years Magioladitis (talk) 08:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Denis Cohen[edit]

There are several mentions in Enwiki of people called "Denis Cohen", none notable enough to have their own article, and this redirect's target (father of a Denis Cohen) isn't the primary topic, and obscures those other results: delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technofascism and Techno-fascism[edit]

Same terminology, different meanings. Does its meaning depend on the absence/presence of the hyphen, or can it have both meanings either way? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • My thought exactly. Either it is a term legitimately attested to in the literature, or else it is POV and should be deleted. Which of these it is, I will leave to smarter contributors than myself – the top Google “hit” points to one of the target Wikipedia articles and the second one points to this RfD itself! (and subsequent “hits” point to academic articles that are way “above my head.”) Bwrs (talk) 05:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
did some looking around and "technofascism" apparently means "fascism that uses technology", not "fascism in technology", so both of those are wrong
either retarget them to fascism or a more fitting target, or cause them to mysteriously disappear delete cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I imagined "technofascism" being a portmanteau of technocracy and fascism (with the former referring to governance by experts, not technology itself) and that it would refer to a blend of both. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
probably true Bwrs (talk) 22:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Bwrs' reasoning. Waylon (was) (here) 17:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dulah, California[edit]

Originally this was a stub article that was PRODded by me; another user removed the PROD and converted the article to a redirect. The problem is, the target does not mention Dulah at all, and (per the original stub) Dulah was nothing more than a rail siding located near Solimar. I find it incredibly unlikely that anyone would search for a rail siding, and even if they did, they won't find any information about it here. The article should have been simply deleted and so should this redirect. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The page was partially merged. I've made an attribution notice in an edit summary at the target to avoid attribution issues in case the page does get deleted. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I redirected the page because I merged content to Solimar Beach and redirects are cheap. The only other reason to keep the redirect is that if you search for the Solimar Beach community in GNIS, the only entry that comes up is Dulah; that's the only reason I started an article under Dulah in the first place, since Solimar Beach is used on local signage and I started the article way back when I assumed GNIS was reliable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak restore article (per WP:PROD, can be taken to AfD if desired), but could this name not be added to the current target? As things stand this is confusing for someone searching this. A7V2 (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 04:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a {{r from merge}} to maintain proper attribution. We can revisit the redirect if that situation changes. - Eureka Lott 02:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move without redirect to Solimar Beach Colony, the only portion of the source page that was merged to target. Note that we would need to deal with Dulah, CA as well. Jay 💬 17:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move without redirect to Solimar Beach Colony per Jay Okmrman (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colonia Ulpia Traiana[edit]

In 2018, Colonia Ulpia Traiana was redirected to Xanten. The page has had some debates in the history, and another user is now indicating that this should not redirect to Xanten, though they haven't created a page, only a 'See also' section to Vetera. Given that they have reverted the redirect, I figured it should come to RfD. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging JoNeuen: Instead of reverting the redirect, please discuss here why you think the current redirect target is incorrect and where you think the page should redirect to. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have proposed this on the Xanten page. The reason for reverting is that Colonia Ulpia Traiana is an archaeological/historical site, which is only briefly discussed in the Xanten article. JoNeuen (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! So, the link to Vetera was made because I created this article myself. As with Colonia Ulpia Traiana, the Vetera article was redirecting to Xanten before, but I cancelled it because I was working on a translation from the German article. I considered this justified, because I didn't get a response on the Xanten talk page in over a week. Since translating and complementing articles using translation is what I mostly do here, my intention is to do the same with Colonia Ulpia Traiana. The Xanten page is already considered incomplete and these German pages are full of valuable historic and archaeological information that might benefit English speaking Wikipedia. JoNeuen (talk) 22:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • How about restoring this version? The editor in question was a suspected sock, but the article was neither deleted nor the edits hidden for socking. Jay 💬 17:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Strongly oppose doing that. It wasn't deleted because there was a pre-sock version to revert to. It wasn't revdelled because that's generally not done. We don't reward socking like that. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Jay's proposal to restore the earlier version, and use it as the basis of further development (which would heavily involve translation from de.wiki). Refusing to use the article on the grounds that it would "reward socking" is cutting off WP's nose to spite its face. Furius (talk) 13:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snow White remake[edit]

Could refer to most films listed at {{Snow White}}, such as Mirror Mirror (film) and Snow White and the Huntsman. There really is no expectation that this redirect references Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) since there have been so many film versions of Snow White that are not Disney-related. Steel1943 (talk) 03:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget Snow White (disambiguation), basically everything on that list after the first is a remake by definition. Alternatively, delete due to being vague and unhelpful (deletion is probably my first choice now that I think about it more), Wikipedia is not a search engine to figure out what article people are imagining in their heads by typing "remake" nowadays. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    On second thought, I'm striking my retarget !vote. Wikipedia is not a search engine, "remake" is not useful in the form of a redirect. Currently it refers to anything on that list, but it's too vague and subjective in doing so (as remake isn't mentioned). Would be ridiculous to have Foo remake target any disambiguation page with multiple pieces of fiction with the same title, so let Google or Wikipedia's search function figure it out. Delete. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Retarget to Snow White (disambiguation) as plausible search by a reader. I'm also fine with delete due to the malformed "remake" modifier --Lenticel (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget as per Utopes, and tag as R from incomplete disambig. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator preference: Delete per above. The existence of the word "remake" and since it makes it so the redirect is not a word-for-word title variation of "Snow White" leave me to believe that the nominated redirect is better deleted than targeting a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Snow White (franchise) that has got hatnotes to anything else the reader may be interested in. I find this a better alternative to Snow White (disambiguation). I find suffixing of "remake" to a film as a valid search term. I would do the same if I was looking for a film remake, or the latest remake if there are multiple. Jay 💬 06:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As far as I'm aware, the upcoming Disney remake is the most notable (if not the only) remake of a previous film titled Snow White. Mirror Mirror (film) is not a remake of a prioer film; neither is Snow White and the Huntsman. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per InfiniteNexus's argument. Fieari (talk) 23:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Infinite. Disney's remake is the only one I've seen referred to as this and is the most notable as Infinite said. The others do not qualify as a remake. Retargeting to a DAB page and deleting are not viable options as we are supposed to help guide readers, and with the amount of traction the upcoming film has gotten already, I'm sure this will remain a useful search term as those looking for the "Snow White remake" are most likely looking for the 2025 film. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 15:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete every new unrelated iteration is a new remake -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 05:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Retarget to the disambiguation as a vague term better left to search rather than presumptuosly assuming one specific target is meant. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Snow White (disambiguation). There are multiple Snow White movies and although I'm sure the person who made the redirect means the 2025 Disney movie, some people may mean different movies than the Disney remake. Waylon (was) (here) 16:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PanoramaMaker[edit]

There is no information about a panorama maker at the target stub, much less a brand called PanoramaMaker. Not currently a helpful redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 04:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Utopes' reasoning. Waylon (was) (here) 16:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Comparison of photo stitching software per Jay. I don't see a reason to AfD that target... possibly it could be renamed "List of..." instead of "Comparison of..." but as a list I think it would pass WP:NLIST and seems well sourced. Anyway, right now it has all the information we possess, and probably all that we should posess, on PanoramaMaker, so that should be the target. Fieari (talk) 03:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baak (Telugu Film)[edit]

Indian films sometimes do this thing were they reshoot 10% or less of the film in another language. Either way, there is absolutely no need for this redirect when Baak (film) exists. only 10% or less of people interest seeing Aranmanai 4 will likely opt to see this version due to low key release. DareshMohan (talk) 05:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I think this is the same film as Baakghost. It looks like there is no point for this. Cleo Cooper (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC) (Striking account globally locked as an LTA ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 16:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]
  • Keep: This is obviously linked with the Afd of Baakghost. Here too, I suggest to Keep the redirect (and then rename. Baak (Telugu film) if needed, and maybe ask for page protection. Like that, history can be kept and further work on the article is easier. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to Baak (film) without redirect as the title has incorrect capitalization which is arguably an RDAB error. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Okmrman (talk) 04:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Baak (film) already exists, no point in moving stuff around. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blockbuster Monster Movie[edit]

could literally refer to any mainstream monster/kaiju movie such as the monsterverse movies Okmrman (talk) 04:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The Production section of the target article states that [o]n February 18, 2022, Robot Communications announced the film, with the working title Blockbuster Monster Movie (超大作怪獣映画, Chōtaisaku Kaijū Eiga), via a casting call on its official website. If there aren't any other films that have been known by the same title, I'm inclined to keep the redirect for this reason. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 16:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

American actress[edit]

This seems oddly and overly specific. I feel like we wouldn't want to make a habit of having nationality-plus-profession redirects to articles on professions that do not have an affinity for nationalities (which most do not). I note, by the way, that American actor redirects to Lists of American actors. BD2412 T 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Lists of American actors. Much more useful to readers than the current target. Thefficacy (talk) 03:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_May_11