|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Texas Railroad Museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)|AfD 2) The first discussion was (probably correctly) closed as no consensus. When it was found that there actually were no sources, a second discussion was created. The bureaucracy deemed that to be a "procedural keep" despite the new information. Thus the only way to get this deleted is to take it here, even though we're discussing content rather than process (unless we're saying the second one was closed incorrectly). There are no reliable sources for a planned "Texas Railroad Museum". Therefore this should be deleted. NE2 21:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Burnt Oak Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) This article on one of southern Ontario's foremost indie labels wasn't considered notable, in spite of the fact that two Wikipedia pages have already been designed for its artists by separate parties, it has collectively garnered a slew of coverage on the Internet and in print (consider the links on the Elbow Beach Surf Club page; google more if you wish), and it is widespread enough in operations to encompass artists from cities as far as NYC, not to mention musicians who migrated to Guelph solely for the purpose of signing with it. It might be worth noting, too, that it has been covered nationally by Much Music in Canada, and that one of its artists is currently engaged in a deal with Blocks Recording Club in Toronto, which houses artists such as Owen Pallett, winner of the Polaris Prize. Can we restore it? I can provide vigorous evidence of its significance, if necessary. -- The Thought-Fox 15:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Article on Richard Laviolette and Chris Yang in Queen's Journal: http://www.queensjournal.ca/story/2007-09-25/arts-entertainment/laviolette-takes-chance-makes-friends-and-music/ Article on Elliott Jones of Brides in the Guelph Tribune: http://www.guelphtribune.ca/news/article/144088 Article on Wolfgang Eberhand of Slow Hand Motëm in The Current: http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2006/10/02/ArtsAndEntertainment/Slow-Hand.Motm.Mixes.Psychedelic.And.Pop.Rock.In.brosis-2326394.shtml Review of the Brides' album 'Queens' in Exclaim!: http://www.exclaim.ca/musicreviews/generalreview.aspx?csid2=850&fid1=27246&csid1=114 Review of Elbow Beach Surf Club's self-titled album in Exclaim!: http://www.exclaim.ca/musicreviews/generalreview.aspx?csid1=110&csid2=850&fid1=25360 Review of Tin's album 'Activity' in Exclaim!: http://www.exclaim.ca/musicreviews/generalreview.aspx?csid1=118&csid2=850&fid1=29601 Review of Elbow Beach Surf Club's album 'Billy Club' in Eye Weekly: http://www.eyeweekly.com/music/ondisc/article/12807 Review of Brides' album 'Queens' in Eye Weekly: http://www.eyeweekly.com/music/ondisc/article/12813 Review of Tamsen and Elliott's self-titled album in Broken Pencil: http://www.brokenpencil.com/music/reviews.php?reviewid=16 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.201.151 (talk) 21:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Paul Robinett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) <--- This one at DRV (as AfD4?) -- Suntag ☼ 16:33, 19 October 2008 (UTC) Renetto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) (AfD2) (DRV1) (DRV2) (AfD3)
Besides there being only 5 "votes" that came in only on the first day of this AfD, the nom and the 3 delete "votes" had nothing to do with Wikipedia guidelines or policies (including one "Per Nomination") while the 2 keep ones directly addressed WP:BIO, which this topic easily passes. This should at least be allowed to go to another cycle to gather a real consensus. -- Oakshade 15:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Comparison of web based file managers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) Deletion did not reflect consensus, similar content is already on Wikipedia, and my arguments for not deleting were not addressed in part or whole Archer1742 (talk) 11:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |