The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nom. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 01:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Savoy (restaurant)[edit]

Savoy (restaurant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. This doesn't appear to be a particularly notable restaurant. On top of that, the history section appears to be largely based upon general references to an WP:SPS (although inline citations are not present). — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by nom: I had previously nominated this page for G6 deletion, though the creator of the article reverted my speedy deletion notice without contesting the notice on the article's talk page. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Have you done a BEFORE? Plenty of high-quality hits. Architectural Digest, Helsingin Sanomat Financial Times, Neue Zurcher Zeitung, Monocle, New York Times.... In a book about Alvar Aalto... JBchrch talk 04:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The Architectural Digest source makes it clear that the restaurant is notable for its interior design and the New York Times source makes it clear that it is notable for its cuisine. Thanks to JBchrch. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passes GNG per sources provided by JBchrch.4meter4 (talk) 01:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdrawn in light of the above sources. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 01:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.