The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Dunn (screenwriter)[edit]

Robert Dunn (screenwriter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Screenwriter who may or may not be notable. Out of his 3 films, only one of them has any notability at all. Which he could be a redirect to Heartbreakers. Though I am kind of iffy on this, I'm leaning towards redirect or delete. Wgolf (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No evidence of personal notability DannyS712 (talk) 03:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• No objection - at this stage I cannot remember why I created the article. S a g a C i t y (talk) 11:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Obviously screenwriters can be notable if they get an Oscar or Canadian Screen Award or BAFTA nomination for Best Screenplay, or if they receive reliable source coverage in media — but they're not automatically deemed notable just because the films they wrote exist, and this features neither the notability claim nor the sourcing it would take to get him over the bar. I too have sometimes supported the deletion of my own past contributions to Wikipedia, due to changes in our notability and sourcing standards and/or the evolution of my understanding of how best to present a notable topic, so I sympathize with the creator's inability to remember what they were thinking 11 years ago. Bearcat (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.