The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.

This AFD was not set up properly. Bots had to tag the article with an AFD tag and post a notice on the article creator's talk page. The nominator is encouraged to review instructionst at WP:AFD before considering any future deletion nominations. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maulvi family[edit]

Maulvi family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly a vanity page, pretty much no notability of the family and none of the individuals have their own wiki article. Nothing found to support notability claims and the article itself includes references which make no mention of this family. Individual members may be notable but not the family. As per WP:BIOFAMILY, notability of even one person is not sufficient for the entire family being notable. Jaunpurzada (talk) 16:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh and India. Jaunpurzada (talk) 16:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom. Evaluation of references shows that not only they are unreliable but also unverifiable. There is no significant coverage about the family in reliable sources to contemplate notability. RangersRus (talk) 20:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.