The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as G7. ✗plicit 23:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Loch Urigull[edit]

Loch Urigull (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hoax? Completely unverifiable, the sources given are copies of Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Looks like a hoax to me, and even if the lake does exist I strongly doubt it passes WP:GEOLAND. JavaHurricane 15:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - (edit conflict) The source cites our Sutherland article where Loch Urigull appears in an unsourced list of inland lochs which was added in 2019. Could not find any other sourcing; even if this place does exist, it clearly doesn't merit a standalone article. –dlthewave ☎ 15:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd guess it's a mis-spelling, or possibly an alternative, for Loch Urigill. Mutt Lunker (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As Mutt says it's a mis-spelling but there's no point moving the article because, even for Loch Urigill, the information is entirely wrong. Urigill is notable, a couple of miles long, just southeast of Elphin, Highland. Thincat (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as G7 given the author's comment on the page "Delete this page it's a mistake, it's an accident". eviolite (talk) 22:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Added speedy deletion tag at the same moment. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They've also posted to that effect on my talk page. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no sources found. nothing notable. Oaktree b (talk) 23:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.