The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 15:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kengzi station[edit]

Kengzi station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Line 14 (Shenzhen Metro). Not notable enough for its own article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and China. Shellwood (talk) 15:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article has been expanded since the nomination with additional sources added. There is enough here to warrant a separate article, the line article would soon get messy if all the station articles were merged into it. Garuda3 (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Its sourced and meets GNG now.

Ask me about air Cryogenic air (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - when nominated, had zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Now has a single source from an independent source which goes in-depth about it, and not sure of that source's reliability, since it does not advertise its editing policy.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:03, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I've added two more sources. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 01:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - neither of which mentions the station.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  That's not true. The first source[1] says "2020年8月28日，坑梓站主体结构顺利封顶，是全线第四座封顶的车站，也是坪山区第二座封顶的车站。" and "坑梓站为地下二层岛式站台车站，位于深圳市坪山区坪山大道中段北侧，车站总长约275m，标准段宽约21m，总建筑面积17312㎡。车站共设4个出入口，1个疏散口，2组风亭。" The second source[2] says "在线路的18个站点中，有6个站点在坪山区域内，分别为沙湖站、坪山围站、坪山广场站、珠洋坑站（坪山中心站）、坑梓站、沙田站。“ and "坑梓站周边有坪山区妇幼保健院、光祖中学、平乐骨伤科医院、坑梓中心小学等配套。但周边的居住氛围并不成熟，仅亨龙楼、金田风华苑两个小区，二手房价在2.1-2.5万元/平方米区间。" The station's name in Chinese is "坑梓站", so even if you can't read Chinese you can see that it's mentioned four times in those quotes. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:29, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Sufficient sourcing available to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 20:26, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.