The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. as an ATD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fly91[edit]

Fly91 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References fail WP:CORPDEPTH which is understandable due to this being a proposed airline. No better sources found in a WP:BEFORE. Not yet in operation and the references are mainly routine announcements. CNMall41 (talk) 17:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Aviation, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 17:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Oppose: The airline got an NOC (no objection certificate) to operate from DGCA which is the civil aviation regulatory body in India as mentioned and cited in the article's page, the airline is currently in the process of tying up with partners as mentioned here - https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/transportation/airlines-/-aviation/fly91-gets-udan-routes/articleshow/102114841.cms

  Company's founders are notable and CAPA which is a reliable website mentions information related to this airline - https://centreforaviation.com/data/profiles/airlines/fly91

  Significant coverage from multiple reliable media sources can be found here - https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/manoj-chackos-fly-91-gets-govt-noc-may-start-flying-this-october/articleshow/99793885.cms?from=mdr

  https://zeenews.india.com/aviation/ex-kingfisher-executive-starts-fly-91-airlines-receives-noc-from-aviation-ministry-2599528.html

  https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/transportation/airlines-/-aviation/indias-new-airline-fly91-reveals-first-look-as-it-gears-up-to-fly-by-winter/articleshow/100697572.cms?from=mdr

  https://www.deccanherald.com/business/a-new-airline-fly91-bets-on-regional-connectivity-1179743.html

  The airline has a website which confirms that the airline is genuine and not made up.

  Airline is active on social media Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do these bullet points add up to WP:NCORP? Notability is not inherent. Notability is not determiened by verifiability of the company website. Social media activity is not something we use to determine if a company is notable. Significant coverage must be more than routine announcements. This may be notable in the future if it should go fully into operations. However, as of right now it is WP:TOOSOON and the references do not add up to WP:ORGCRIT in my opinion. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Goa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the issuance of NOC isn't a WP:CRYSTALBALL and doesn't mean the airline would ever even fly. 119.157.78.57 (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify as an WP:ATD until the airline officially begins operations. I would expect at least some coverage once it starts flying so not a huge fan of deletion. S5A-0043^Talk 08:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Until a flight is ticketed, passengers are loaded and flies and lands in another destination, this is pretty much PR. They hope to do this, but right now it's WP:TOOSOON. Nate • (chatter) 21:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify. Doesn't seem to meet CORP right now, but that may change in the coming months, so given that potential, WP:ATD-I —siroχo 03:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.